Case Summary
**Case Summary: Citrix Systems, Inc. v. 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 2601492
**Court:** United States District Court
**Date:** [Add relevant date if available]
**Judge:** [Add Judge's name]
**Background:**
This case involves Citrix Systems, Inc., a prominent software company recognized for its virtual computing technology, and 01 Communique Laboratory, Inc., a smaller entity engaged in the development of remote access software. The dispute arises from allegations of patent infringement, with Citrix claiming that 01 Communique's products infringe upon several of its patented technologies related to remote access and virtualization.
**Legal Issues:**
The central legal issues in this case include:
1. Whether 01 Communique’s products infringe on Citrix's patents.
2. The validity of the patents held by Citrix in the context of existing prior art.
3. Potential claims of equitable relief through injunctions and monetary damages.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff (Citrix Systems, Inc.):** Citrix asserts that 01 Communique has willfully infringed on its patents by utilizing technology that is substantially similar to that covered by Citrix’s patents without permission. They seek damages for lost profits and an injunction to prevent further infringement.
- **Defendant (01 Communique Laboratory, Inc.):** 01 Communique counters that its products do not fall within the scope of Citrix's patents and argues that the patents in question are invalid due to prior art. Additionally, they may contend that Citrix's claims are not sufficiently substantiated.
**Outcome:**
[As the outcome may not have been established, use general terms] The court's decision will hinge on whether it finds that 01 Communique's technology infringes upon Citrix's patents and whether those patents are valid. Possible outcomes include a ruling in favor of Citrix, resulting in financial compensation and an injunction, or a ruling in favor of 01 Communique, leading to the dismissal of the claims against it.
**Significance:**
This case is significant as it not only addresses the enforcement of patent rights within the software industry but also highlights the ongoing challenges in the realm of intellectual property, especially as it pertains to innovation in technology.
**Next Steps:**
Further court proceedings will be determined, and both parties may prepare for potential appeals or settlements based on the court's findings.
(Note: Detailed dates, procedural history, and specific arguments may be added as appropriate based on more comprehensive case facts and outcomes if available.)