Legal Case Summary

Clarence Schreane v. David Ebbert


Date Argued: Wed Jun 21 2017
Case Number: 15-6141
Docket Number: 6078258
Judges:Not available
Duration: 22 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Clarence Schreane v. David Ebbert** **Docket Number:** 6078258 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court of [State or Jurisdiction]] **Date:** [Specify Date of Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Clarence Schreane - **Defendant:** David Ebbert **Facts of the Case:** Clarence Schreane brought a lawsuit against David Ebbert, alleging [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, negligence, etc.]. The case revolves around [provide a brief summary of the underlying facts, such as relevant dates, actions taken by both parties, and any pertinent background information]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues under consideration in this case included: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether the defendant's actions constituted a breach of duty] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., the applicability of certain laws or statutes] 3. [Issue 3: e.g., any defenses raised by the defendant] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Clarence Schreane contended that [summarize plaintiff's arguments, including any evidence or witnesses presented]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** David Ebbert argued that [summarize defendant's arguments and defenses, highlighting any counter-evidence or legal theories presented]. **Court's Decision:** The court [decided/found] that [summarize the court's ruling, including any specific findings of fact or conclusions of law]. The ruling addressed the key legal issues raised during the trial, emphasizing [mention any critical legal principles or precedents referenced by the court]. **Outcome:** As a result of the court's decision, [detail the outcome, such as whether the plaintiff's claims were upheld or dismissed, and any remedies awarded, such as damages or injunctive relief]. **Significance:** This case is significant because [discuss the broader implications of the case, such as its impact on future litigation, relevant legal standards established, or particular interest to legal practitioners]. **Conclusion:** The case of Clarence Schreane v. David Ebbert highlights important aspects of [summarize the key takeaways related to the legal principles or issues discussed], and serves as a reference for similar disputes in the future. --- Please note that specific details regarding the court, dates, and the nature of the case should be filled in where indicated, as the information provided is generic and illustrative based on typical case summaries.

Clarence Schreane v. David Ebbert


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available