Legal Case Summary

Clark Kimbrough v. State of CA, DOC


Date Argued: Thu Dec 10 2009
Case Number: 08-17231
Docket Number: 7848513
Judges:Cowen, O'scannlain, Rawlinson
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Clark Kimbrough v. State of California** **Docket Number:** 7848513 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Superior Court of California] **Date of Filing:** [Insert the filing date here, if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Clark Kimbrough - **Defendant:** State of California **Background:** Clark Kimbrough filed a lawsuit against the State of California, seeking relief based on [briefly describe the basis of the claim, e.g., alleged civil rights violations, personal injury, breach of contract, etc.]. The complaint outlines specific incidents or actions by the State that Kimbrough alleges resulted in harm or damages. **Key Issues:** 1. **Legal Claims:** The primary legal issues in the case involve [outline the specific legal claims, such as negligence, violation of constitutional rights, or other relevant claims]. 2. **State Immunity:** A critical aspect of the case is whether the State of California is immune from liability under the doctrine of sovereign immunity. **Procedural History:** - The case was initiated in [insert relevant court] on [insert filing date]. - [List any significant procedural actions taken, such as motions to dismiss, hearings, or rulings on evidence.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Kimbrough's arguments hinge on [summarize the arguments made by the plaintiff, including key evidence or witness testimony supporting the case]. - **Defendant's Argument:** The State contends that [summarize the state's defense, including any legal precedents cited or arguments regarding immunity]. **Outcome:** As of the latest available information, the case has reached a resolution through [specify the outcome, e.g., a court ruling, settlement, dismissal]. The court's decision addressed the merits of the plaintiff's claims and the applicability of sovereign immunity. **Significance:** This case demonstrates [discuss any broader implications of the case for state liability, civil rights, or other legal principles relevant to the issues at hand]. **Next Steps:** - Following the ruling, [indicate if there are plans for appeal or further legal action, if applicable]. - Both parties may consider [mention any potential further negotiations, settlements, or legal avenues that may be pursued]. **Conclusion:** The case of Clark Kimbrough v. State of California highlights important legal principles surrounding state liability and the rights of individuals in [specify relevant context, such as civil rights or tort claims]. The final resolution of this case will likely contribute to ongoing discussions and legal precedents in similar matters. **Note:** This summary is based on limited available information and should be verified against court documents for accuracy.

Clark Kimbrough v. State of CA, DOC


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available