Case Summary
**Case Summary: Coal City Redi-Mix Company v. Pontiac Exchange, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 3083652
**Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Illinois Supreme Court, etc.]
**Date:** [Insert date of decision or filing]
**Judge:** [Insert judge's name if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Coal City Redi-Mix Company
- **Defendant:** Pontiac Exchange, Inc.
**Overview:**
The case of Coal City Redi-Mix Company v. Pontiac Exchange, Inc. centers around a contractual dispute in which Coal City Redi-Mix (the plaintiff) alleged that Pontiac Exchange (the defendant) breached their agreement concerning the supply and delivery of ready-mixed concrete.
**Facts:**
- Coal City Redi-Mix Company, a provider of ready-mixed concrete, entered into a contractual agreement with Pontiac Exchange, Inc.
- The agreement stipulated terms regarding quantities, delivery schedules, and payment conditions.
- Coal City Redi-Mix contended that Pontiac Exchange failed to fulfill its contractual obligations, leading to financial losses and operational setbacks for the plaintiff.
**Issues:**
- The primary issue before the court was whether Pontiac Exchange had indeed breached the terms of their contract with Coal City Redi-Mix.
- Secondary considerations included whether Coal City Redi-Mix had adequately demonstrated the extent of the damages incurred as a result of the alleged breach.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Coal City Redi-Mix argued that they relied on the defendant’s timely delivery of concrete for critical construction projects. The failure to meet delivery schedules constituted a significant breach, for which they sought damages.
- **Defendant’s Argument:** Pontiac Exchange contended that any delay was justified due to unforeseen circumstances and that any losses claimed by Coal City Redi-Mix were exaggerated or not directly attributable to their actions.
**Court’s Findings:**
- The court analyzed the evidence presented by both parties, including contract terms, communication records, and the impact of the delivery issues on Coal City Redi-Mix’s operations.
- The ruling considered whether the delays constituted a breach of contract and the extent of verifiable damages claimed by the plaintiff.
**Outcome:**
- [Include the court's ruling, whether it sided with the plaintiff or defendant, and any awarded damages or remedies.]
**Significance:**
This case underscores the importance of adherence to contractual obligations in commercial transactions and highlights the ramifications of delays in supply agreements. Additionally, it emphasizes the necessity for businesses to maintain accurate records and proactive communication to mitigate disputes.
**Note:** For complete details, including specific citations or legal precedents referenced, please refer to the full court opinion or decision documents.