Case Summary
**Case Summary: Revision Commission v. Public Resource.org, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 7807395
**Court:** [Specify the Court if known, e.g., United States Court of Appeals]
**Date:** [Specify the date of the court decision or filing, if known]
### Background:
The case centers around the legal contention involving the Code Revision Commission and Public Resource.org, Inc., which is a nonprofit organization dedicated to providing free access to legal materials and public records. The Commission, responsible for the revision and publication of state statutes and codes, contends that Public Resource.org infringed upon its copyrights by reproducing and distributing state laws and codes without authorization.
### Legal Issues:
1. **Copyright Infringement:** The primary issue is whether Public Resource.org’s activities constitute copyright infringement under federal law. The Commission asserts that the laws and codes it publishes are protected under copyright law, and thus any unauthorized reproduction or distribution violates its rights.
2. **Public Access to Legal Materials:** On the other hand, Public Resource.org argues that the laws should be publicly accessible and that copyright should not apply to governmental works, especially those that serve the public interest.
### Arguments:
- **Revision Commission's Position:** The Commission argues that its compilation and presentation of the state laws are original works deserving of copyright protection. The organization claims that Public Resource.org’s actions undermine its ability to finance the revision and dissemination of the law.
- **Public Resource.org's Position:** Conversely, Public Resource.org maintains that legal texts should be in the public domain, and they argue for a broad interpretation of fair use. They emphasize the necessity of unrestricted access to legal documents for the sake of transparency and civic engagement.
### Procedural History:
The case has progressed through various stages, from initial filings and arguments to motions for summary judgment. The decision at hand deals with the balance between copyright law and the public’s right to access legal information.
### Current Status:
As of the last available update, the court's ruling on the motion for summary judgment or jury trial status is anticipated. The implications of this case could significantly affect how legal materials are distributed and accessed in the digital age.
### Conclusion:
The outcome of Revision Commission v. Public Resource.org, Inc. may set a precedent regarding the accessibility of legal texts and the scope of copyright protection for governmental entities. It highlights a critical intersection between intellectual property rights and the public's right to access legal information.
**Note:** Further specifics regarding the judges, opinion details, and dissent (if any) would be critical to flesh out a more comprehensive case summary. Please provide additional context or details if needed.