Case Summary
**Case Summary: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 1.01 Acres**
**Docket Number:** 2592528
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
- **Defendant:** 1.01 Acres (Property Owner)
**Background:**
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC ("Plaintiff") is a natural gas company that operates a pipeline network across various states. The case involves a dispute over a specific parcel of land measuring 1.01 acres owned by the Defendant.
The Plaintiff sought to obtain access to the Defendant's property for the purpose of laying down gas pipelines as part of their operational infrastructure. The legal contention revolves around the rights of the gas company to utilize the land under eminent domain laws and the property owner's rights under state law.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Whether Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC had the legal authority to exercise eminent domain over the 1.01 acres.
2. The valuation of the property and compensation owed to the landowner for the use of their land.
3. Potential damages to the property owner for the disruption or alteration of their property.
**Court Proceedings:**
The Plaintiff filed a motion for a declaration of its right to access and use the land in question, arguing that it was a necessary part of their operations to provide natural gas to consumers and meet regulatory requirements. The Defendant countered by asserting that the company did not properly follow statutory requirements, and that the intended use would negatively impact their property.
**Outcome:**
[Insert the court's decision, including whether the court ruled in favor of the Plaintiff or Defendant, and any compensation awarded. If the case is ongoing, note that an outcome is yet to be determined.]
**Conclusion:**
The case of Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 1.01 Acres presents significant questions regarding eminent domain powers, property rights, and fair compensation. The outcome may set precedents regarding the extent of utility companies' rights to access private land for infrastructure projects and the protections afforded to landowners in such disputes.
[Add any additional notes or implications relevant to the case, such as appeals or further litigation steps.]
**Note:** Specific details regarding the court's decision and any subsequent actions are necessary to complete the case summary.