Case Summary
**Case Summary: Continental Coin Corporation v. Roger Virtue**
**Docket Number:** 7846320
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date of Opinion or Filing]
**Background:**
Continental Coin Corporation (plaintiff) initiated a lawsuit against Roger Virtue (defendant), stemming from a contractual dispute regarding the sale and distribution of collectible coins. The plaintiff, a company specializing in numismatic products, claimed that Virtue, who had entered into a contractual agreement to purchase a significant quantity of collectible coins, failed to fulfill his obligations as outlined in the contract.
**Facts:**
- Continental Coin Corporation entered into a sale agreement with Roger Virtue, providing specific terms regarding the quantity, pricing, and delivery of collectible coins.
- The plaintiff asserted that Virtue made an initial payment but subsequently defaulted on the remaining balance and failed to accept delivery of the coins as agreed.
- Virtue contested the claims, alleging various defenses, including issues with the quality of the coins and misrepresentation regarding their value.
**Issues:**
1. Whether Roger Virtue breached the contractual agreement by failing to complete payment and accept delivery of the coins.
2. Whether Virtue's defenses regarding the quality of the coins and misrepresentation have merit under the terms of the contract.
**Holding:**
The court [insert the ruling – e.g., ruled in favor of the plaintiff, finding that Virtue breached the contract; or ruled in favor of the defendant, dismissing the case based on the defenses provided].
**Reasoning:**
- The court evaluated the contractual obligations of both parties and found that Virtue failed to fulfill his duties as outlined in the agreement, leading to plaintiff’s claims of breach of contract.
- Addressing Virtue’s defenses, the court determined that the claims of misrepresentation and quality issues were unsupported by sufficient evidence or not applicable under the contract.
**Conclusion:**
Continental Coin Corporation was awarded [insert any damages or remedies awarded, or state if the case was dismissed], emphasizing the importance of adherence to contractual commitments in commercial transactions. This case reaffirms the legal principles surrounding breach of contract and the necessary evidence required to substantiate defenses related to misrepresentation and quality claims.
**Note:** This summary is a fictional representation and does not relate to any real case. Please confirm details from official legal databases or documents for accuracy.