Legal Case Summary

Corbett Le Grand v. James Yates


Date Argued: Thu Aug 14 2014
Case Number: CA2014-03-082
Docket Number: 2602885
Judges:TASHIMA, McKEOWN, CLIFTON
Duration: 18 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Corbett Le Grand v. James Yates, Docket Number 2602885** **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date] **Citation:** [Insert Citation if available] **Parties Involved:** - Appellant: Corbett Le Grand - Appellee: James Yates **Background:** In the case of Corbett Le Grand v. James Yates, the plaintiff, Corbett Le Grand, brought a legal action against the defendant, James Yates, under unspecified grounds. The case revolves around [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, etc.], which has raised legal questions that warranted judicial review. **Facts:** - [Insert a concise statement of the relevant facts of the case, including dates, actions taken by both parties, and any background information that led to the dispute.] - [Include any pertinent actions taken prior to filing the case, such as negotiations, attempts at resolution, or prior related litigation.] **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues presented in this case include: - [Specify the key legal questions the court had to address, e.g., Was there a breach of contract? Did the defendant commit negligence?] - [Mention any statutes or legal principles that are particularly relevant to the case.] **Trial Court's Decision:** - [Summarize the trial court's findings or ruling, including the outcomes for both parties, and any penalties or remedies ordered]. - [Indicate whether the trial court issued a written opinion, and if so, briefly summarize its key points.] **Appeal:** - Corbett Le Grand appealed the trial court's decision, contending that [insert the appellant's main arguments or the reasons for the appeal, such as misapplication of law, insufficient evidence, etc.]. - James Yates responded to the appeal, arguing that [insert the appellee's main points or defenses in opposition to the appeal]. **Court's Analysis:** - The appellate court reviewed the case focusing on [summarize the main aspects of the court’s analysis, referencing any legal standards or precedents it considered]. - The court evaluated [discuss how the court approached the legal issues, including any important evidence or arguments]. **Holding:** - The appellate court either upheld or overturned the trial court's decision. [Clearly state the ruling of the appellate court, as well as any directives given regarding further proceedings, if applicable.] **Conclusion:** The case of Corbett Le Grand v. James Yates serves as a significant ruling on [mention the implications of the court's decision on the law or practice area]. This case highlights [insert any key takeaways or lessons learned from the case]. **Notes:** - [Any additional notes or relevant commentary on the case, including its impact or significance.] --- **[Please note that specific details such as the court name, dates, and specific factual circumstances have not been provided as they were not included in your request. You may need to add actual case details to complete this summary.]**

Corbett Le Grand v. James Yates


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available