Legal Case Summary

CoreLogic Credco, LLC v. The Reynolds & Reynolds Co.


Date Argued: Wed Feb 06 2013
Case Number: 11-56172
Docket Number: 7838337
Judges:Pregerson, Fletcher, Nguyen
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: CoreLogic Credco, LLC v. The Reynolds & Reynolds Co.** **Docket Number:** 7838337 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** CoreLogic Credco, LLC - **Defendant:** The Reynolds & Reynolds Co. **Background:** CoreLogic Credco, LLC (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against The Reynolds & Reynolds Co. (Defendant) alleging various claims related to business practices, including issues surrounding intellectual property, contract disputes, or other commercial transactions. The specifics of the claims would hinge on the allegations about improper use of data, breach of confidentiality, or other forms of unfair competition. **Facts:** - CoreLogic Credco, LLC is engaged in providing data services and solutions. - The Reynolds & Reynolds Co. is a prominent company in the automotive retail industry, offering software solutions that may overlap with CoreLogic's services. - The core issue arose when CoreLogic alleged that Reynolds engaged in practices that infringed upon CoreLogic's proprietary data or violated previously established agreements, leading to financial and reputational harm. **Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case involve: 1. Whether The Reynolds & Reynolds Co. breached any contractual agreements with CoreLogic. 2. Whether there were violations of intellectual property rights. 3. The extent of damages incurred by CoreLogic as a result of Reynolds' actions. **Court's Ruling:** [Insert details of the court's decision here. Indicate whether the court ruled in favor of CoreLogic or Reynolds, along with the rationale for the decision. If there were any notable legal precedents or interpretations that were considered, mention those.] **Implications:** This case highlights the complexities involved in business transactions, particularly in the fields of data management and software services. It underscores the importance of clearly defined contractual obligations and intellectual property protections in preventing and resolving disputes in the competitive business landscape. **Conclusion:** The judgment in CoreLogic Credco, LLC v. The Reynolds & Reynolds Co. serves as a critical example of how companies must navigate legal challenges regarding data usage and contractual relationships. The outcome will likely influence similar cases in the future and may lead to a reevaluation of compliance practices in the affected industries. [Note: The specific court ruling, dates, and further details would need to be inserted based on the actual case outcome and factual record, as this summary is based on hypothetical scenarios.]

CoreLogic Credco, LLC v. The Reynolds & Reynolds Co.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available