Legal Case Summary

Cornerstone Bank and Trust v. Consolidated Grain and Barge Co.


Date Argued: Wed Apr 06 2011
Case Number: 4-10-0715
Docket Number: 3087117
Judges:Not available
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Cornerstone Bank and Trust v. Consolidated Grain and Barge Co.** **Docket Number: 3087117** **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Date:** [Insert Date Here] **Facts:** Cornerstone Bank and Trust (Plaintiff) filed a lawsuit against Consolidated Grain and Barge Co. (Defendant) concerning a financial transaction that involved a loan agreement between the parties. The bank alleged that the defendant defaulted on the loan, resulting in significant financial losses for the plaintiff. The case arose from a series of transactions where the defendant borrowed funds from the plaintiff to facilitate its operational costs and capital expenses. The loan agreement included terms pertaining to repayment schedules, interest rates, and collateral requirements. Allegedly, the defendant failed to make scheduled payments, leading to Cornerstone Bank and Trust seeking recovery of the outstanding amounts as stipulated in the agreement. **Issues:** 1. Did Consolidated Grain and Barge Co. default on the loan agreement with Cornerstone Bank and Trust? 2. What damages is Cornerstone Bank and Trust entitled to as a result of the alleged default? **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff (Cornerstone Bank and Trust):** The plaintiff argued that the evidence clearly demonstrated that the defendant failed to meet its financial obligations under the terms of the loan agreement. The bank called for strict enforcement of the contract and sought recovery for the principal amount of the loan, accrued interest, and any additional costs associated with the collection process. - **Defendant (Consolidated Grain and Barge Co.):** The defendant contended that financial difficulties hindered their ability to service the debt as initially agreed. They argued that the plaintiff had not provided sufficient notice of default or the opportunity to rectify the situation. The defendant also disputed the amount of damages claimed by the plaintiff, asserting that it was inflated and not reflective of the actual financial impact. **Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [insert decision favored party], finding that [insert key points of the court's decision]. The court ordered the defendant to [insert details of the ruling, including any damages awarded to the plaintiff]. **Significance:** This case highlights the importance of clear contract terms and the obligations of both parties in a loan agreement. It also emphasizes the potential consequences of defaulting on financial obligations and the restitution sought by lenders in such scenarios. **Conclusion:** Cornerstone Bank and Trust v. Consolidated Grain and Barge Co. served as a pivotal case in addressing the complexities surrounding business loans and the enforcement of contracts within financial transactions. The ruling established precedents regarding the enforcement of lender rights and the responsibilities of borrowers in fulfilling their obligations. **[Insert any additional notes or relevant information here]**

Cornerstone Bank and Trust v. Consolidated Grain and Barge Co.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available