Case Summary
**Case Summary: County Wide Landscaping, Inc. v. Grigaliunas**
**Docket Number:** 3085643
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court, Appellate Court, etc.]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Decision]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** County Wide Landscaping, Inc.
- **Defendant:** Grigaliunas
**Background:**
County Wide Landscaping, Inc. filed a lawsuit against Grigaliunas concerning a dispute over a landscaping contract. The plaintiff, a landscaping company, claimed that Grigaliunas breached a contract for landscaping services by failing to make payments for services rendered.
**Facts:**
- County Wide Landscaping, Inc. entered into a contract with Grigaliunas to provide landscaping services on certain properties.
- The contract outlined the scope of work, payment terms, and timelines for completion.
- The plaintiff completed the services as agreed upon but did not receive full payment from the defendant, leading to the present lawsuit.
**Issues:**
- Whether Grigaliunas breached the contract by failing to pay for the completed landscaping services.
- The amount of damages suffered by County Wide Landscaping, Inc. as a result of the alleged breach.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** The plaintiff argued that they performed all contractual obligations and were entitled to payment as per the contract terms. They presented evidence of completed work and communications regarding payment.
- **Defendant's Argument:** Grigaliunas contended that the services provided were unsatisfactory and did not meet the standards outlined in the contract, thus justifying non-payment.
**Ruling:**
The court found in favor of County Wide Landscaping, Inc., determining that Grigaliunas had breached the contract by failing to pay for the landscaping services rendered. The court held that the plaintiff had fulfilled their obligations and was entitled to monetary damages.
**Damages Awarded:**
The court ordered Grigaliunas to pay damages to County Wide Landscaping, Inc. in an amount reflecting the unpaid balance for services rendered, along with any applicable interest and costs associated with the lawsuit.
**Conclusion:**
The case highlighted the importance of adhering to contractual obligations and provided a precedent concerning disputes related to service contracts in the landscaping industry. The ruling reinforced the principle that satisfactory performance entitles service providers to full payment unless there is valid justification for non-payment.
**Note:** For specific details about the court's decision, including any appeals or additional context, further research into official court documents would be necessary.