Case Summary
**Case Summary: Coyne v. Milan Police Pension Board**
**Docket Number:** 3085814
**Court:** [Court Name] (Specify the court if known)
**Date:** [Filing Date, if available]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Coyne (First Name, if known)
- **Defendant:** Milan Police Pension Board
**Background:**
This case involves a dispute between Coyne and the Milan Police Pension Board regarding issues related to pension benefits. The plaintiff, Coyne, has challenged decisions made by the pension board, alleging that they have wrongfully denied or reduced pension benefits to which he is entitled under the governing pension statutes and regulations.
**Legal Issues:**
Key legal issues in this case may include:
1. The interpretation of pension plan eligibility and benefit calculations.
2. Compliance of the Milan Police Pension Board with state pension laws.
3. The standards for judicial review of administrative decisions made by pension boards.
**Facts:**
- Coyne served as a police officer with the Milan Police Department for a number of years and was a member of the Milan Police Pension Fund.
- Following his service, Coyne applied for pension benefits, which he claims were improperly calculated or denied by the Pension Board.
- The board's rationale for their decision involved [brief description of the board's reasoning, if available].
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Coyne argues that he meets all eligibility criteria for receiving full pension benefits and contends that the board failed to follow proper procedures in making their decision.
- **Defendant's Argument:** The Milan Police Pension Board defends its actions by stating that they adhered to the rules and guidelines stipulating the qualifications for pension benefits and that their calculations were accurately conducted.
**Outcome:**
[This section should include the decision made by the court, if available. If the case is still pending, this can be noted as well.]
**Implications:**
This case could have implications for how pension boards govern benefits for police officers and may address broader considerations regarding the rights of public employees in accessing their pension entitlements.
**Conclusion:**
The Coyne v. Milan Police Pension Board case highlights the complexities involved in pension administration and the potential for disputes regarding benefits eligibility and calculations. The court’s ruling will likely influence future cases involving pension disputes.
(Note: Be sure to insert any specific details, dates, or additional context that may be available for a more comprehensive case summary.)