Legal Case Summary

Craig Milhouse v. Travelers Commercial Insurance


Date Argued: Mon Feb 01 2016
Case Number: 13-56959
Docket Number: 7835964
Judges:Paez, M. Smith, Silver
Duration: 46 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Craig Milhouse v. Travelers Commercial Insurance** **Docket Number:** 7835964 **Court:** [Insert relevant court name here] **Date:** [Insert relevant date here] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Craig Milhouse - **Defendant:** Travelers Commercial Insurance **Background:** Craig Milhouse initiated legal proceedings against Travelers Commercial Insurance, seeking compensation for damages under an insurance policy. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to fulfill its obligations under the terms of the insurance policy following a covered incident. **Facts:** - Craig Milhouse held a commercial insurance policy with Travelers Insurance which included coverage for [insert specific coverage details, e.g., property damage, business interruption, etc.]. - On [insert date of incident], an event occurred that the plaintiff alleges is covered by the insurance policy, resulting in significant [insert type of damages, e.g., property loss, business downtimes, etc.]. - Following the incident, the plaintiff filed a claim with the defendant for the damages incurred. - Travelers Commercial Insurance allegedly denied the claim or provided insufficient compensation, leading to the dispute. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case involve: 1. Whether the damage or loss claimed by the plaintiff falls within the coverage of the insurance policy. 2. The appropriateness of Travelers Commercial Insurance's denial of the claim. 3. The potential breach of contract by the insurance company concerning the policy terms. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Craig Milhouse argues that the damages were clearly covered by the policy and that the insurer's failure to pay constitutes a breach of contract. The plaintiff seeks damages for both the financial loss incurred and any consequential damages resulting from the denial of the claim. - **Defendant's Argument:** Travelers Commercial Insurance contends that the claim was correctly denied based on [insert reason for denial, e.g., policy exclusions, insufficient evidence of loss, etc.]. The insurance company asserts it acted within its rights and obligations as per the policy terms. **Outcome:** [Insert information about the ruling, if available, or note that the case is ongoing.] **Conclusion:** The case of Craig Milhouse v. Travelers Commercial Insurance centers on the interpretation of the insurance policy and the insurer's responsibilities in the wake of a claim. The outcome will depend on the court's determination of coverage and breach of contract issues. Further proceedings are anticipated to clarify the obligations of the parties involved. **Note:** This summary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. It is essential to refer to the official court documents for detailed and accurate case information.

Craig Milhouse v. Travelers Commercial Insurance


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available