Legal Case Summary

CresCom Bank v. Edward L. Terry


Date Argued: Tue Jan 27 2015
Case Number: 518631
Docket Number: 2629076
Judges:Diana Gribbon Motz, Albert Diaz, Andre M. Davis
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Crescom Bank v. Edward L. Terry** **Docket Number:** 2629076 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. District Court, State Court] **Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling] **Overview:** Crescom Bank initiated a lawsuit against Edward L. Terry concerning a dispute over a financial transaction that arose from a loan agreement. The crux of the case revolves around allegations of default and the subsequent actions taken by Crescom Bank to recover the owed amounts. **Facts of the Case:** - Crescom Bank extended a loan to Edward L. Terry, which was secured by certain collateral. - Allegations arose that Terry failed to comply with the terms of the loan agreement, leading to default. - Following the default, Crescom Bank sought to recover the debt through legal means, which included attempts to collect the amount owed as well as enforcement of the security interest in the collateral. **Legal Issues:** 1. Whether Edward L. Terry defaulted on the loan agreement as alleged by Crescom Bank. 2. The legality and appropriateness of Crescom Bank's actions taken in response to the alleged default. 3. The rights of both parties regarding the enforcement of the loan agreement and the collateral. **Arguments:** - **Crescom Bank:** Argued that Terry breached the loan agreement by failing to make timely payments and asserted their right to pursue collection options as stipulated in the contract. - **Edward L. Terry:** Contested the claims of default, possibly presenting defenses related to the terms of the agreement, the bank's practices in loan management, or other mitigating circumstances. **Court Ruling:** (Pending or specific ruling details should be provided here once the judgment is known. Include points on the court’s interpretation of the contract, findings on default, and any orders for payment or modification of terms.) **Significance:** This case highlights key principles of contract law, particularly concerning loan agreements and the obligations of parties involved. It also emphasizes the importance of clear communication and documentation in financial transactions. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Crescom Bank v. Edward L. Terry may influence similar future cases regarding loan defaults and the enforcement of financial agreements, serving as a reference for both banks and borrowers in understanding their rights and responsibilities under loan contracts. (Note: Specific details about the court, date, and ruling should be filled in as per the actual case proceedings and judgment.)

CresCom Bank v. Edward L. Terry


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available