Legal Case Summary

Crittenden v. Cook County Commission on Human Rights


Date Argued: Tue Mar 19 2013
Case Number: 114876-114911-cons
Docket Number: 3084340
Judges:Not available
Duration: 19 minutes
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Crittenden v. Cook County Commission on Human Rights** **Docket Number:** 3084340 **Court:** Cook County Commission on Human Rights **Date:** [Include Date of Decision if available] **Overview:** Crittenden v. Cook County Commission on Human Rights addresses issues of discrimination in the workplace under the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance. The case revolves around the allegations made by the complainant, Crittenden, against the Cook County Commission regarding employment discrimination based on [specify basis, e.g., race, gender, disability]. **Facts:** Crittenden filed a complaint alleging that the Cook County Commission engaged in discriminatory practices that adversely affected his employment status. The specifics of the allegations included [mention specific incidents, actions, or patterns of behavior alleged, e.g., unfair treatment in promotions, failure to accommodate, retaliatory actions]. **Legal Issues:** The main legal issues presented in this case include: 1. Whether the actions taken by the Cook County Commission constituted discrimination as defined under the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance. 2. The burden of proof required to establish a case of discrimination. 3. The remedies available to the complainant should discrimination be proven. **Arguments:** - **For the Complainant (Crittenden):** Crittenden argued that he was subjected to discriminatory treatment which constituted a violation of his rights under the Cook County Human Rights Ordinance. Evidence was presented to support claims of [mention any specific evidence, such as testimonies, documents, etc.]. - **For the Respondent (Cook County Commission):** The Cook County Commission contested the allegations, arguing that the actions taken were justified and that there was no intent to discriminate against Crittenden. They sought to prove that [provide a brief overview of the defense’s position]. **Decision:** The Commission ultimately ruled on the allegations, examining the evidence presented from both sides. [Summarize the ruling, whether the complaint was upheld or dismissed, and any implications or penalties assessed against the Cook County Commission, if applicable.] **Significance:** The case highlights the ongoing issues of workplace discrimination and the importance of adhering to human rights regulations within governmental entities. The outcome has implications for future cases of discrimination, case interpretation of human rights ordinances, and workplace environments in cook County and potentially beyond. **Conclusion:** Crittenden v. Cook County Commission on Human Rights underscores the continuous need for vigilance in addressing workplace discrimination and the importance of legal frameworks designed to protect employees' rights. The decision serves as a reference point for similar future cases involving human rights and employment discrimination. [Note: The actual details and outcomes of the case should be verified with the official court documents or legal sources as this is a general template.]

Crittenden v. Cook County Commission on Human Rights


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available