Legal Case Summary

Cross v. Multnomah County


Date Argued: Mon Dec 06 2004
Case Number: 03-35563
Docket Number: 7858929
Judges:T.G. Nelson, Rawlinson, Pollak
Duration: 16 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Cross v. Multnomah County** **Docket Number:** 7858929 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Circuit Court of Multnomah County, Oregon] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** [Name of Plaintiff, e.g., John Cross] - **Defendant:** Multnomah County **Case Overview:** The case of Cross v. Multnomah County revolves around [briefly summarize the nature of the dispute, e.g., a claim against the county regarding negligence, civil rights violations, etc.]. The plaintiff, John Cross, brought a suit against Multnomah County alleging [specific allegations, e.g., failure to provide adequate services, violation of rights, etc.]. **Facts of the Case:** 1. **Incident Details:** [Provide a succinct description of the events leading to the lawsuit. Include dates, locations, and any relevant actions taken by the parties involved.] 2. **Plaintiff's Claims:** The plaintiff asserts that [detail the claims made by the plaintiff against the county, including any specific legal grounds, damages sought, etc.]. 3. **Defendant's Response:** Multnomah County has [summarize the county's defense, any counterclaims, or motions they filed in response to the allegations]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in this case include: - [List key legal issues, e.g., employment law violations, administrative negligence, constitutional rights implications, etc.] - [Additional issues if applicable] **Procedural History:** - The case was filed on [date of filing]. - [Detail any significant motions, hearings, or rulings that occurred in the lead-up to the current status of the case.] **Outcome:** - [If the case has been resolved, provide a brief summary of the outcome, including any verdicts or settlements. If ongoing, note the current status, e.g., awaiting trial, in mediation, etc.] **Significance:** This case is significant because [explain why the case matters in a broader legal context, e.g., implications for municipal liability, interpretation of civil rights statutes, etc.]. --- **Note:** [Adjust the placeholders with specific details as needed. Be sure to verify factual information as required, especially for legal documents.]

Cross v. Multnomah County


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available