Case Summary
**Case Summary: Crump v. Expressway Motors, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 8135469
**Court:** [Specify court if known, e.g., Circuit Court, State Court]
**Date:** [Specify date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Crump
- **Defendant:** Expressway Motors, Inc.
**Background:**
In the case of Crump v. Expressway Motors, Inc., the plaintiff, Crump, brought a lawsuit against the defendant, Expressway Motors, Inc., arising from a dispute related to the sale of a motor vehicle. The specifics surrounding the transaction, including the nature of the alleged grievances, such as breach of contract, misrepresentation, or warranty issues, are central to understanding the case.
**Key Facts:**
1. The plaintiff alleged that the vehicle purchased from Expressway Motors, Inc. contained undisclosed defects that affected its safety and usability.
2. Crump claimed that Expressway Motors did not provide adequate disclosures related to the vehicle's history, including prior accidents or repairs.
3. The plaintiff sought damages to cover the costs of repairs, as well as potential losses incurred as a result of being unable to use the vehicle.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal questions in this case included:
- Whether Expressway Motors, Inc. failed to disclose critical information about the vehicle, constituting fraud or misrepresentation.
- The extent of damages that Crump suffered as a result of the alleged issues with the vehicle.
- The applicability of any warranty or service agreements pertaining to the vehicle's sale.
**Court's Decision:**
[Insert details about the ruling, e.g., whether the court ruled in favor of the plaintiff or the defendant, and any legal reasoning provided in the decision.]
**Outcome:**
Details on the awarded damages (if any), as well as whether any appeals were filed, would be noted here.
**Significance:**
This case highlights critical aspects of consumer protection laws related to vehicle sales, including the obligation of dealers to disclose pertinent information regarding the condition and history of a vehicle. The outcome may set precedents for similar future disputes between consumers and auto dealers.
**Conclusion:**
Crump v. Expressway Motors, Inc. illustrates the complexities involved in motor vehicle transactions and underscores the importance of transparency in automotive sales. This case serves as a reference point for both consumers and automotive dealers regarding their rights and responsibilities.
(Note: The information presented is generic and should be supplemented with specific details from actual case records for accuracy.)