Case Summary
**Case Summary: Cynthia Carrillo-Yeras v. Michael Astrue**
**Docket Number:** 7845170
**Court:** [Insert Court Name, e.g., United States District Court]
**Date:** [Insert Date]
**Overview:**
Cynthia Carrillo-Yeras filed a case against Michael Astrue, in his capacity as the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA). The case revolves around Carrillo-Yeras's appeal regarding the denial of social security benefits.
**Background:**
Cynthia Carrillo-Yeras applied for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI), claiming that she was disabled due to [insert specific medical conditions or disabilities claimed]. The SSA initially reviewed her application and subsequently denied her claim, stating [insert reason for denial, e.g., lack of medical evidence, ability to perform work, etc.].
**Procedural History:**
After the denial of her benefits, Carrillo-Yeras sought a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ reviewed the medical evidence, hearing testimonies, and other relevant information before affirming the SSA's decision to deny benefits. Unconvinced by the ALJ's ruling, Carrillo-Yeras appealed the decision to the federal district court.
**Issues:**
1. Whether the ALJ properly evaluated and weighed the medical evidence provided in support of Carrillo-Yeras's disability claim.
2. Whether the ALJ applied the correct legal standards in determining Carrillo-Yeras's residual functional capacity (RFC).
3. Whether substantial evidence supports the ALJ's determination that Carrillo-Yeras could perform jobs existing in significant numbers in the national economy.
**Decision:**
The court reviewed the administrative record, including medical records, ALJ hearing transcripts, and evaluation reports. It examined the arguments presented by both sides. The court ultimately determined that [insert brief explanation of the court's ruling, e.g., the ALJ's decision was upheld, reversed, or remanded for further proceedings].
**Conclusion:**
The ruling in the case of Cynthia Carrillo-Yeras v. Michael Astrue impacts the ongoing discussion regarding the standards and evidentiary requirements for the approval of social security benefits. The decision underscores the necessity for thorough medical documentation and adherence to procedural standards in disability claims.
**Significance:**
This case highlights the challenges many applicants face when seeking Social Security benefits and the importance of proper representation and strong medical evidence in such proceedings.
[Note: Please add specific details about the court's ruling, dates, and any additional pertinent information as needed.]