Legal Case Summary

Cynthia Raynor v. United of Omaha Life Ins.


Date Argued: Wed Apr 05 2017
Case Number: 14-36090
Docket Number: 4669665
Judges:Kozinski, W. Fletcher, Tunheim
Duration: 23 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Cynthia Raynor v. United of Omaha Life Insurance, Docket No. 4669665** **Court Overview:** The case of Cynthia Raynor v. United of Omaha Life Insurance involves a dispute over a life insurance policy purportedly issued by United of Omaha Life Insurance to Cynthia Raynor. The litigation centers around the claims and defenses associated with the policy and its benefits. **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Cynthia Raynor - **Defendant:** United of Omaha Life Insurance **Facts of the Case:** Cynthia Raynor filed a claim under a life insurance policy issued by United of Omaha. After the insured individual’s death, Raynor, as the designated beneficiary, sought to receive the insurance benefits. However, United of Omaha denied the claim, citing reasons that may involve technicalities in the policy's terms, potential lapses, or other legal stipulations. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal questions revolve around: 1. The validity of the insurance policy and its coverage. 2. The grounds for United of Omaha's denial of the claim. 3. The interpretation of policy terms and conditions. **Procedural History:** Cynthia Raynor initiated the lawsuit against United of Omaha, seeking a declaration of rights under the insurance policy and an order for the payment of benefits. The case progressed through motions and pleadings, with both parties presenting arguments regarding the interpretation of the contract and the circumstances surrounding the claim denial. **Outcome:** The court's decision regarding the case would hinge on the evidence presented, the interpretation of insurance contract law, and applicable state regulations guiding life insurance policies. Depending on the ruling, Raynor may either be entitled to the benefits, or the court may uphold the denial by United of Omaha. **Implications:** This case may have implications for understanding insurance policy enforcement, beneficiary rights, and the responsibilities of insurance providers in assessing claims. A ruling in favor of Raynor could enhance protections for policyholders and beneficiaries in similar situations, while a ruling for United of Omaha could set precedents regarding the stringent adherence to policy terms. **Conclusion:** Cynthia Raynor v. United of Omaha Life Insurance is a significant case that explores the intersection of life insurance claims, contractual obligations, and beneficiaries’ rights. The final determination will reflect on the nuanced relationship between policyholders and insurance providers in the context of life insurance claims.

Cynthia Raynor v. United of Omaha Life Ins.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available