Case Summary
**Case Summary: Daniel Berry v. Michael Astrue**
**Docket Number:** 7847990
**Court:** [Specify court, e.g., United States District Court]
**Date:** [Specify date of decision or filing]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Daniel Berry
- **Defendant:** Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security
**Background:**
Daniel Berry filed a claim for social security disability benefits, asserting that he was unable to work due to various medical conditions. After an initial application was denied, he requested a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). The ALJ ultimately ruled against Berry, prompting him to appeal the decision.
**Legal Issues:**
The main issues in the case involved:
1. Whether the ALJ properly evaluated Berry’s medical evidence and subjective complaints of pain.
2. Whether the ALJ’s decision to deny benefits was supported by substantial evidence.
3. Whether the ALJ correctly applied the legal standards for determining disability under the Social Security Act.
**Court's Findings:**
The court examined the record, including the medical evidence presented, the testimony of Berry, and the ALJ's reasoning in the denial of benefits. The judge analyzed whether the ALJ had adhered to the required legal standards and whether the denial was made with an adequate basis in evidence.
**Conclusion:**
The court's decision either upheld or reversed the ALJ's ruling and may have remanded the case for further proceedings or granted the requested benefits, depending on its findings regarding the evaluation of evidence and the application of legal standards.
**Outcome:**
[Detail the outcome of the case, whether the decision was favorable or unfavorable to Berry, along with any further instructions or actions ordered by the court.]
**Significance:**
This case illustrates the complexities involved in social security disability claims and highlights the importance of thorough evidence evaluation by ALJs in determining eligibility for benefits. It underscores the legal protections afforded to those seeking disability benefits under the Social Security Act.
---
*Note: Specific details (court name, date, and outcome) would be necessary to complete this summary accurately.*