Legal Case Summary

Daniel Neelon v. Stan Bharti


Date Argued: Tue Dec 09 2014
Case Number: E053187
Docket Number: 2613096
Judges:Smith, Wardlaw, Berzon
Duration: 26 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Daniel Neelon v. Stan Bharti** **Docket Number:** 2613096 **Court:** [Specify the Court, e.g., Superior Court, District Court] **Date:** [Insert Relevant Date] **Parties Involved:** - Plaintiff: Daniel Neelon - Defendant: Stan Bharti **Background:** Daniel Neelon filed a lawsuit against Stan Bharti, alleging [insert brief description of the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, fraud, personal injury, etc.]. The case revolves around events that transpired on or about [insert relevant date or timeframe], where Neelon claims [briefly outline Neelon's allegations against Bharti, including any relevant facts or incidents that prompted the lawsuit]. **Key Issues:** The main issues of contention in the case include: 1. [Insert Issue #1, e.g., Did Stan Bharti breach the terms of the contract with Daniel Neelon?] 2. [Insert Issue #2, e.g., Was there fraudulent misrepresentation involved?] 3. [Insert Issue #3, if applicable.] **Proceedings:** The case has undergone several court hearings, during which both parties presented evidence and testimonies. [Mention any significant motions, rulings, or developments that occurred during the proceedings, such as motions to dismiss, summary judgment, etc.] **Findings:** The court's findings will address the claims made by Daniel Neelon against Stan Bharti, evaluating the evidence presented and the validity of the allegations. [Discuss any preliminary rulings or important determinations made by the court, if available.] **Conclusion:** [Summarize the current status of the case, e.g., whether it is pending, whether a verdict has been reached, or if an appeal is expected. Mention any upcoming dates or deadlines related to the case.] **Note:** This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The specifics of the case may evolve, and it is crucial to consult legal counsel for an in-depth understanding of the matter. [Adjust the summary as needed with specific details relevant to the case, as this is a general template.]

Daniel Neelon v. Stan Bharti


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available