Case Summary
**Case Summary: Daniel Norcia v. Samsung Telecom America**
**Docket Number:** 4479660
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court or Court of Appeals, if known]
**Date Filed:** [Insert Date of Filing]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Daniel Norcia
- **Defendant:** Samsung Telecom America
**Background:**
Daniel Norcia filed a lawsuit against Samsung Telecom America alleging [insert specific claims, e.g., breach of warranty, product defect, consumer fraud]. The case emerged from [briefly describe the context, such as a transaction involving a Samsung product and any relevant facts leading to the dispute].
**Claims:**
The plaintiff's primary claims include:
1. [Claim 1: e.g., Breach of warranty - specify if it was express or implied]
2. [Claim 2: e.g., Negligence - state how the defendant failed to meet care standards]
3. [Additional claims as applicable]
**Facts:**
- The plaintiff purchased a [specific Samsung product] from [store/website] on [purchase date].
- Shortly after purchase, the product allegedly [describe the issue, e.g., malfunctioned, failed to perform as advertised].
- The plaintiff sought remedies [mention any attempts to return the product, communicate with Samsung, etc.].
**Legal Issues:**
The case revolves around several legal issues including:
- Whether Samsung Telecom America breached its warranty obligations.
- The applicability of consumer protection laws in the context of the claims made by Norcia.
- [Any other relevant legal issues.]
**Proceedings:**
The case underwent [briefly outline any significant pre-trial motions, hearings, or settlements]. A [trial date/schedule] was established, with both parties involved in discovery processes to gather evidence.
**Outcome:**
As of [insert current status, e.g., date of verdict or settlement], the court [describe the ruling or settlement outcome, if available, or indicate if the case is ongoing].
**Significance:**
This case is notable for its implications regarding [discuss any broader implications, such as consumer rights, product liability law, or corporate responsibility].
**Conclusion:**
The case of Daniel Norcia v. Samsung Telecom America highlights critical issues in consumer protection and corporate accountability in the technology sector. As it proceeds, it may set important precedents for how similar disputes are handled in the future.
*Note: This summary is based on hypothetical information as the actual details of the case may vary. Please refer to the official court documents for accurate legal information.*