Legal Case Summary

Daniel Saunders v. King County


Date Argued: Tue Nov 05 2013
Case Number: 12-35834
Docket Number: 7837081
Judges:Kozinski, Paez, Berzon
Duration: 14 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Daniel Saunders v. King County** **Docket Number:** 7837081 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision, if known] **Overview:** The case of Daniel Saunders v. King County involves a legal dispute in which the plaintiff, Daniel Saunders, filed a lawsuit against King County, alleging certain grievances related to [insert specific claims, e.g., negligence, civil rights violations, etc.]. **Facts:** - Daniel Saunders contends that [briefly outline the key facts of the case, including what led to the lawsuit and any relevant background information]. - Specific incidents leading to the lawsuit occurred on [insert relevant dates or timeline of events]. - Saunders alleges that King County [insert details of the alleged wrongful action or negligence]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in this case include: 1. [Insert Legal Issue 1, e.g., Did King County act within its legal authority?] 2. [Insert Legal Issue 2, e.g., Were the rights of the plaintiff violated due to the actions of the County?] 3. [Any additional legal issues relevant to the case.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** - Saunders argues that [summarize plaintiff's main arguments and legal reasoning]. - He seeks [insert relief sought, e.g., monetary damages, injunctive relief]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** - King County contends that [summarize the defendant's main defenses and reasoning]. - The County argues that [insert any legal protections or defenses claimed, such as governmental immunity]. **Court's Findings:** [Insert the court's ruling on the case, including decisions on any motions, findings of fact, and conclusions of law. Include whether the case was dismissed, whether it went to trial, and what the final judgment was.] **Conclusion:** The court's decision in Daniel Saunders v. King County marks a significant ruling concerning [insert implications of the decision, e.g., public policy, impact on future cases, etc.]. The outcome reflects the court's stance on [insert relevant legal principles, rights involved, etc.]. **Next Steps:** Depending on the outcome, either party may seek to appeal the decision, which could lead to further judicial review and potential implications for future related cases in the jurisdiction. **Note:** This summary is a fictional representation and should be tailored to include specific details and accurate information pertaining to the actual case.

Daniel Saunders v. King County


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available