Legal Case Summary

Daniel Shantu v. Loretta Lynch


Date Argued: Thu Mar 24 2016
Case Number: 15-1175
Docket Number: 3048328
Judges:Robert B. King, Albert Diaz, Pamela A. Harris
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Daniel Shantu v. Loretta Lynch** **Docket Number:** 3048328 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. Court of Appeals, District Court] **Date Filed:** [Insert date if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Petitioner/Appellant:** Daniel Shantu - **Respondent/Appellee:** Loretta Lynch, former U.S. Attorney General **Background:** Daniel Shantu filed an appeal against Loretta Lynch in connection with [specific issue, e.g., immigration status, denial of visa, deportation proceedings, etc.]. The case stems from [briefly describe the events leading to the appeal, e.g., an administrative decision made by the Department of Homeland Security]. **Facts:** 1. Daniel Shantu was [provide relevant personal background, e.g., an immigrant from a specific country]. 2. [Describe the key events that lead to the dispute, including any applications submitted, decisions made, and actions taken by the government.] 3. Shantu's application/request was [denied/approved] by [specific agency] on [date], leading to his appeal. **Legal Claims:** Shantu contended that: - [List key legal arguments made by Shantu, such as violations of statutory rights, due process violations, etc.] - He challenged the decision based on [specific laws, regulations, or constitutional provisions]. **Outcome in Lower Court:** The [specific court] ruled in favor of Loretta Lynch, [summarize the decision made by the lower court, any relevant findings of fact or law, and the rationale behind the ruling]. **Arguments on Appeal:** On appeal, Shantu argued that: - [Summarize the primary arguments presented in the appeal, including any new evidence, legal precedents cited, etc.] - He contended that the lower court erred in [specify any alleged errors]. **Conclusion:** The appeal requested that the higher court [either reverse the lower court's decision, remand for further proceedings, etc.]. The case underscores the complexities surrounding [mention key legal issue or themes relevant to the case, e.g., immigration law, administrative procedure, etc.]. **Status:** [Explain the current status of the case, such as whether it is ongoing, pending a decision, dismissed, etc. Include any interim rulings or developments if applicable.] **Note:** For more detailed information regarding the legal implications and possible outcomes, it is recommended to consult legal experts or case law databases. --- This summary provides a general framework based on the requirements. For specific details regarding the case, actual court documents and records should be referenced.

Daniel Shantu v. Loretta Lynch


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available