Case Summary
**Case Summary: Danielle Orr v. Assurant Employee Benefits**
**Docket Number:** 2611770
**Court:** [Please specify the court if known, e.g., United States District Court]
**Date:** [Insert relevant date of filing or judgment]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Danielle Orr
- **Defendant:** Assurant Employee Benefits
**Background:**
Danielle Orr, the plaintiff, filed a lawsuit against Assurant Employee Benefits, the defendant, concerning the denial of a claim for benefits under an employee benefits insurance policy. The case arose under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), which governs employee benefits plans.
**Facts:**
The plaintiff alleged that she submitted a claim for benefits pertaining to [specific type of benefits, e.g., short-term disability, long-term disability], which was denied by Assurant. Danielle argued that the denial was wrongful and lacked substantial justification. The plaintiff represented that she met all necessary criteria for coverage under the policy and that her condition was documented and consistent with the policy’s terms.
**Issues:**
The central issues in this case included:
1. Whether Assurant Employee Benefits acted in accordance with the terms of the insurance policy in denying the claim for benefits.
2. Whether the plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to support her claim for benefits.
3. Whether Assurant’s decision to deny the claim was arbitrary and capricious or fell within the reasonable interpretation of the policy.
**Court Proceedings:**
The case proceeded through various stages, including pleadings, discovery, and potentially motions for summary judgment. The court reviewed evidence presented by both parties, which included medical records, policy documents, and correspondence related to the claim.
**Holding:**
[This section would include the court's decision. If a decision has been reached, summarize the outcome, such as whether the court upheld the denial or ruled in favor of the plaintiff.]
**Conclusion:**
The case of Danielle Orr v. Assurant Employee Benefits underscores the complexities involved in ERISA claims and the interpretation of insurance policy terms. The outcome of the case may have implications for similar future cases regarding employee benefits claims.
**Notes:**
- [Any additional notes, such as appeals, further actions, or important remarks related to the case.]
**Disclaimer:**
This case summary is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes. For specific legal details or outcomes of actual cases, please refer to official court records or legal databases.