Legal Case Summary

David Burke v. County of Alameda


Date Argued: Thu Jul 16 2009
Case Number: 08-15658
Docket Number: 7849763
Judges:Nelson D. W., Fletcher W. , Paez
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: David Burke v. County of Alameda** **Docket Number:** 7849763 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** David Burke - **Defendant:** County of Alameda **Background:** David Burke filed a lawsuit against the County of Alameda, alleging various claims related to [insert relevant issues, e.g., negligence, violation of civil rights, employment discrimination, etc.]. The complaint outlines the circumstances leading to the dispute, which involves [briefly summarize the facts leading to the case, e.g., an incident, policy enforcement issues, or employment matters]. **Claims:** Burke’s major claims against the County of Alameda include: 1. **[Claim 1]**: [Brief description of claim, e.g., wrongful termination, failure to provide safe working conditions, etc.] 2. **[Claim 2]**: [Brief description of another claim, if applicable]. 3. **[Claim 3]**: [Continue with any additional claims as necessary]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** David Burke contends that the County of Alameda acted negligently and failed to adhere to [mention relevant laws or regulations], which resulted in [describe the harm or damage caused to the plaintiff]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** The County of Alameda has denied the allegations, arguing that [summarize the defense's position, such as lack of liability, adherence to policy, or other legal defenses]. **Outcome:** [Insert any known outcomes, such as settlement details, decisions made by the court, or scheduled hearings. If the case is ongoing, indicate that and mention any upcoming procedural steps.] **Significance:** This case sheds light on [discuss the broader implications of the case, such as public policy considerations, potential impacts on local governance, employee rights, or civil liberties]. **Next Steps:** As of the last court update, the case is set to proceed to [next steps, such as trial dates, further motions, or hearings]. [Insert any deadlines for filings or upcoming court dates if applicable.] **Conclusion:** David Burke's lawsuit against the County of Alameda raises critical issues regarding [summarize key issues], and the outcome could have ramifications beyond the immediate parties involved. **Note:** This summary is based on the information available and should be verified against case records for accuracy and completeness.

David Burke v. County of Alameda


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available