Legal Case Summary

David Oppelt, Jr. v. Pat Glebe


Date Argued: Fri Dec 06 2013
Case Number: 12-35698
Docket Number: 7836871
Judges:Whyte, Hawkins, Tallman
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: David Oppelt, Jr. v. Pat Glebe** **Docket Number:** 7836871 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Superior Court, District Court, etc.] **Date:** [Insert date of filing/decision if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** David Oppelt, Jr. - **Defendant:** Pat Glebe **Background:** David Oppelt, Jr. initiated a legal action against Pat Glebe, seeking resolution on matters relating to [insert brief context of the dispute, such as breach of contract, property dispute, personal injury, etc.]. The parties engaged in a series of proceedings outlining their respective claims and defenses. **Facts:** - [Summarize relevant facts of the case, highlighting key events that led up to the dispute]. - [Include important dates and actions taken by both parties]. - [Mention any pertinent details that provide context or impact the case outcome]. **Issues:** The primary legal issues presented before the court included: 1. [Issue 1 – e.g. Breach of contract: Did Pat Glebe fail to perform obligations as per the agreement with David Oppelt, Jr.?] 2. [Issue 2 – e.g. Negligence: Was Pat Glebe negligent in a manner that caused harm to David Oppelt, Jr.?] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** David Oppelt, Jr. argued that [insert key arguments made by the plaintiff, including claims, legal bases, and desired outcomes]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Pat Glebe asserted that [insert key arguments from the defendant's side, refuting claims or providing defenses]. **Court Decision:** - [Summarize the decision made by the court, including any findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the reasoning behind the judgment]. - [Include any orders directed by the court, such as damages awarded, injunctions, etc.]. **Significance:** - [Comment on the implications of the ruling, its impact on the parties involved, and how it may influence future cases or precedents in similar legal matters]. **Conclusion:** The case of David Oppelt, Jr. v. Pat Glebe illustrates essential principles of [insert relevant areas of law] and emphasizes the court's role in adjudicating disputes between private parties. Further developments or appeals may provide additional insights into the effectiveness of the judicial process in resolving such matters. --- *Note: Please fill in the placeholders with specific information relevant to the case, as this summary is constructed generically due to lack of detailed case data.*

David Oppelt, Jr. v. Pat Glebe


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available