Legal Case Summary

David Pride, Jr. v. M. Correa


Date Argued: Thu Dec 06 2012
Case Number: 10-56036
Docket Number: 7838518
Judges:Pregerson, Noonan, Paez
Duration: 38 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: David Pride, Jr. v. M. Correa** **Docket Number:** 7838518 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Judges Involved:** [Insert Judges Names] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Case Overview:** David Pride, Jr. filed a case against M. Correa, raising various claims pertaining to [insert relevant legal matters, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The specifics of the claims center around [insert key issues or facts in the case, e.g., property disputes, employment disagreements, etc.]. **Background:** The dispute arose from [provide a brief background of the events leading to the lawsuit, including any pertinent actions taken by either party]. Pride alleged that Correa [insert key allegations, such as a failure to uphold contracts, negligence resulting in damages, etc.]. Correa responded by [insert Correa's defense or counterclaims]. **Key Issues:** 1. [Issue One]: [Describe the first major legal issue in the case]. 2. [Issue Two]: [Describe the second major legal issue]. 3. [Additional Issues]: [Any additional relevant legal issues or claims]. **Procedural History:** The case progressed through various stages, beginning with the filing of the complaint on [insert date]. Correa filed a response and potentially counterclaims on [insert date]. The court conducted hearings on [insert key dates of hearings], allowing both parties to present evidence and arguments. **Findings of the Court:** After reviewing the evidence and considering the arguments from both sides, the court found that [insert key findings related to each issue]. [If applicable, insert the rationale used by the court to arrive at its conclusions]. **Conclusion:** The court ruled in favor of [David Pride, Jr. / M. Correa], concluding that [summarize the court's decision, including any awards or dismissals]. The ruling underscored [any significant implications of the ruling or legal precedent set by the case]. **Next Steps:** Following the conclusion of the trial, the parties may pursue [appeal options, enforcement of judgment, or any other relevant follow-up actions]. The case highlights [any broader legal principles or societal implications]. **Notes:** [Insert any additional notes relevant to the case, such as its impact on future cases, public interest, etc.] --- This summary is intended to provide an overview of the case David Pride, Jr. v. M. Correa and may need additional specific details extracted from the actual court documents for complete accuracy.

David Pride, Jr. v. M. Correa


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available