Legal Case Summary

David Wulfe v. Valero Refining Company-Calif.


Date Argued: Tue Feb 02 2016
Case Number: 13-57177
Docket Number: 7835947
Judges:Wardlaw, Hurwitz, Rice
Duration: 41 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: David Wulfe v. Valero Refining Company-Calif.** **Docket Number:** 7835947 **Court:** [Insert relevant court name, if known] **Date:** [Insert date of filing and/or judgment, if known] **Judge:** [Insert name of judge, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** David Wulfe - **Defendant:** Valero Refining Company-Calif. **Background:** David Wulfe filed a lawsuit against Valero Refining Company-Calif., alleging [briefly state the nature of the claims, such as employment discrimination, personal injury, etc.]. The plaintiff contends that [insert key facts leading to the dispute, such as specific actions taken by the defendant that caused harm to the plaintiff, relevant dates, parties involved, and any contractual obligations or legal standards violated]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolve around [specify legal issues, such as breach of contract, negligence, violation of statutory obligations, etc.]. The plaintiff asserts that [outline the plaintiff’s main arguments and claims, including any specific laws or regulations cited]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Wulfe argues that [summarize the plaintiff's position, emphasizing key facts supporting his claim]. He seeks [detail what the plaintiff is requesting, such as monetary damages, injunctive relief, etc.]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Valero Refining Company-Calif. counters by [summarize the defendant's defenses and counterarguments]. The company claims that [include key points that the defendant uses to refute the allegations, such as lack of responsibility, compliance with laws, etc.]. **Outcome:** The case is [state whether the case was settled, dismissed, or went to trial, along with the verdict if applicable]. [If available, include any statements from the judge or jury and subsequent implications for the parties involved]. **Conclusion:** David Wulfe v. Valero Refining Company-Calif. serves as a significant example of [highlight the case's broader implications, such as industry practices, employee rights, or legal precedent]. The resolution of this case is important for [mention any implications for similar cases or the industry as a whole, if relevant]. (Note: This summary is based on hypothetical assumptions. The actual case may contain specific details that are not included here. For an accurate summary, access to case files or detailed reports is necessary.)

David Wulfe v. Valero Refining Company-Calif.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available