Case Summary
**Case Summary: Deanna Kelley v. Carolyn Colvin**
**Docket Number:** 3062547
**Court:** United States District Court (specific court not mentioned)
**Date:** [Insert relevant date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Deanna Kelley
- **Defendant:** Carolyn Colvin (acting Commissioner of Social Security)
**Case Overview:**
Deanna Kelley filed a case against Carolyn Colvin, the acting Commissioner of Social Security, challenging the denial of her claim for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits.
**Facts of the Case:**
- Deanna Kelley alleged that she suffers from a number of debilitating medical conditions that prevent her from engaging in substantial gainful activity.
- Kelley applied for SSDI benefits, stating that her impairments included [specific medical conditions, e.g., chronic pain, mental health issues].
- Her application was initially denied by the Social Security Administration (SSA) on the grounds that she was still able to perform some form of work.
**Issues:**
The primary issue in this case pertains to whether the administrative law judge (ALJ) made a proper determination regarding Kelley’s ability to work, given her claimed disabilities. The case also addresses the legal standards and procedures that should be followed in the evaluation of SSDI claims.
**Procedural History:**
- Kelley’s initial claim for benefits was denied.
- Upon requesting a hearing, the ALJ upheld the denial, leading Kelley to seek judicial review of the decision.
- Kelley argued that the ALJ failed to properly assess the medical evidence and her credibility, and that the decision lacked substantial evidence.
**Judicial Considerations:**
In reviewing the case, the court considered:
1. The medical evidence presented by Kelley, including opinions from treating physicians.
2. The credibility of Kelley’s testimony regarding her restrictions and limitations.
3. The application of the five-step sequential evaluation process used by the SSA to assess disability claims.
**Conclusion:**
- The outcome of the case generally involves either the upholding of the ALJ's decision or a remand for further proceedings.
- The court may agree with Kelley’s argument that the ALJ failed to adequately account for her medical impairments, necessitating a reevaluation of her claim.
**Significance:**
This case underscores the challenges that applicants face in securing SSDI benefits and highlights the importance of thorough medical documentation and accurate legal procedures in the assessment of disability claims.
**Note:** For an accurate judgment, decision date, and specific outcomes, court records should be consulted.