Legal Case Summary

Debbie Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.


Date Argued: Thu Dec 10 2009
Case Number: 09-35183
Docket Number: 7848511
Judges:Benitez, Gould, Tallman
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Debbie Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7848511 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., U.S. District Court, State Court, etc. if known] **Date of Filing:** [Include the filing date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Debbie Donohue - **Defendant:** Quick Collect, Inc. **Background:** Debbie Donohue filed a lawsuit against Quick Collect, Inc. alleging violations related to [specify the nature of the claims, e.g., consumer protection laws, debt collection practices, harassment, etc.]. The plaintiff claims that the defendant engaged in practices that were illegal or improper according to [specify the relevant laws or regulations, if known]. **Claims:** - The plaintiff alleges that Quick Collect, Inc. violated [specify legal bases, such as the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, state-specific statutes, etc.], by [describe the alleged actions of the defendant, e.g., making harassing phone calls, failing to provide required disclosures, etc.]. - [Include any additional claims or allegations, such as emotional distress, economic damages, etc.] **Defendant's Response:** Quick Collect, Inc. has responded to the complaint by [summarize the defendant's position, e.g., denying the allegations, claiming compliance with legal standards, or asserting affirmative defenses]. **Current Status:** As of [include the date of the last update, if known], the case is in [specify the procedural posture, e.g., awaiting trial, in mediation, on summary judgment motion, etc.]. The parties may be engaged in discovery, or the court may be addressing preliminary motions. **Significance:** This case highlights issues related to [discuss the broader implications or significance of the case, particularly regarding debt collection practices, consumer rights, or other relevant legal areas]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Debbie Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc. may set important precedents concerning the regulation of debt collection agencies and consumer protections within [specify the jurisdiction or legal context]. Further developments in the case will be closely monitored. [Note: This case summary is a hypothetical representation and may not reflect real case details. For accurate information, please refer to official legal documents and court records related to the case.]

Debbie Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available