Case Summary
**Case Summary: Deborah Oberg v. Michael Astrue**
**Docket Number:** 7839640
**Court:** United States District Court
**Date:** [Include the relevant date of the ruling]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Deborah Oberg
- **Defendant:** Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA)
**Background:**
Deborah Oberg filed a case against Michael Astrue, who was the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration at the time. The case revolves around Oberg's claim for social security benefits, which she contended were wrongfully denied.
**Facts:**
- Oberg applied for social security disability benefits, citing various medical issues that prevented her from obtaining gainful employment.
- The SSA initially denied her claim, prompting Oberg to request a hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ).
- After the hearing, the ALJ similarly denied her request, leading Oberg to appeal the decision through the appropriate channels within the Social Security Administration.
**Legal Issues:**
The key legal issues in the case included:
- Whether the ALJ followed proper procedures and regulations in evaluating Oberg's claim.
- Whether the evidence presented supported the denial of benefits.
- The proper application of legal standards regarding disability determinations.
**Court's Findings:**
The court reviewed the administrative record, including medical evaluations, testimonies from Oberg, and relevant legal standards. The court evaluated whether the ALJ's decision was supported by substantial evidence and adhered to the appropriate legal criteria.
**Conclusion:**
Following its review, the court ruled in favor of either affirming or reversing the ALJ's decision based on its findings. The outcome had implications for Oberg’s eligibility for benefits and highlighted the importance of administrative procedures in social security cases.
**Implications:**
This case serves as an important precedent regarding the evaluation of disability claims and the administrative responsibilities of the SSA. It underscores the necessity for clear evidence and adherence to regulatory standards in the determination of social security disability benefits.
**Note:** For further details, such as the specific ruling, citations, or procedural history, please reference official court documents or legal databases.