Legal Case Summary

Dennison v. City of Phoenix


Date Argued: Fri Nov 21 2008
Case Number: 07-35251
Docket Number: 7851107
Judges:Fletcher, Fisher, Breyer
Duration: 29 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Dennison v. City of Phoenix** **Docket Number:** 7851107 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., U.S. District Court, Arizona] **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Overview:** The case of Dennison v. City of Phoenix involves a civil action where the plaintiff, Dennison, brought claims against the City of Phoenix regarding [specific legal issues, e.g., civil rights violations, employment discrimination, etc.]. The nature of the claim is rooted in [briefly describe the background of the dispute, e.g., events that led to the lawsuit, specific laws alleged to be violated, etc.]. **Facts:** - The plaintiff, Dennison, alleged that on [specific date or time period], actions taken by the City of Phoenix [describe the actions taken, e.g., termination of employment, police conduct, etc.] violated his rights under [specify the legal statutes or constitutional rights involved]. - Dennison contends that [provide key factual details that support the plaintiff's claims, such as discriminatory practices, lack of due process, etc.]. - The City of Phoenix responded to these allegations, stating that [summarize the city’s defense, including any justifications or legal arguments made by the city]. **Issues:** 1. Whether the actions of the City of Phoenix constituted [specific legal violation, e.g., a violation of civil rights under Title VII, Section 1983, etc.]. 2. [Any additional legal issues or questions raised in the case]. **Court’s Analysis:** The court examined [briefly describe the analysis performed by the court, legal standards applied, evidence considered, etc.]. The key points included: - The legal standards for evaluating claims of [insert relevant legal framework]. - Consideration of evidence presented by both parties, including [mention any crucial evidence or witness testimony]. - The court’s interpretation of applicable law and its precedents. **Conclusion:** The court ultimately [decided in favor of/against] Dennison, citing [summarize the main reasoning of the court's decision]. The ruling established [describe the implications of the ruling, such as setting a precedent, reaffirming rights, etc.]. **Outcome:** The final judgment [provide details about the judgment, including any damages awarded or orders given, settlement terms, or directions for further action]. The case reflects ongoing issues related to [insert any broader societal implications or relevance of the case]. **Note:** This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Parties involved should seek legal counsel for specific guidance regarding case outcomes and their implications. --- (Note: Ensure that all facts and details are appropriately filled in with actual case information along with the correct legal terms and court details. This is a generalized template and may require adaptation based on the specific content of the case.)

Dennison v. City of Phoenix


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available