Legal Case Summary

Deverturda v. Globe Aviation Security Services


Date Argued: Wed Jun 14 2006
Case Number: 04-16633
Docket Number: 7856175
Judges:Rymer, T.G. Nelson, King
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Deverturda v. Globe Aviation Security Services** **Docket Number:** 7856175 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court of [State]] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Background:** In the case of Deverturda v. Globe Aviation Security Services, the plaintiff, [Plaintiff's Full Name], brought forward a legal action against Globe Aviation Security Services, the defendant. The plaintiff alleged [briefly describe the nature of the allegations, e.g., negligence, breach of contract, employment disputes] related to [specific circumstances or events leading to the legal action]. **Facts:** The key facts in this case include: - The events leading to the lawsuit occurred on [specific date or range of dates]. - The plaintiff was employed at Globe Aviation Security Services in [specific position]. - [Outline significant events or incidents that contributed to the dispute, such as unsafe work conditions, alleged wrongful termination, or failure to adhere to safety protocols.] - [Mention any specific policies or contractual obligations that were at issue.] **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal issues, including: - Whether Globe Aviation Security Services had a duty of care towards the plaintiff. - Whether there was a breach of that duty, resulting in damages to the plaintiff. - [Include any relevant statutory or regulatory considerations, if applicable.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Position:** The plaintiff argues that Globe Aviation Security Services failed to provide a safe working environment, which led to [specific harm or loss]. The plaintiff claims [possible remedies sought, such as compensation for lost wages, damages for emotional distress, etc.]. - **Defendant's Position:** Globe Aviation Security Services contends that they adhered to all relevant safety regulations and that the plaintiff's claims are unfounded. The defendant may argue [specific defenses used by the defendant, e.g., lack of negligence, contributory negligence by the plaintiff, etc.]. **Outcome:** [Include the outcome if available, such as a ruling, settlement details, or if the case is still ongoing. If applicable, mention damages awarded, further legal proceedings, or implications of the ruling.] **Implications:** This case could have broader implications for [discuss any relevant industry impacts, potential changes in policy for Globe Aviation Security Services or similar companies, or precedents that could be set for future cases]. **Conclusion:** As the proceedings continue, the court's decision in Deverturda v. Globe Aviation Security Services will likely provide important insights into employer responsibilities within the aviation security industry and could influence future litigation in similar circumstances. **Note:** This summary is based on hypothetical information since the specific details of the case are not available. For accurate information, further research into court documents and proceedings related to this case is recommended.

Deverturda v. Globe Aviation Security Services


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available