Legal Case Summary

Donald Stacy v. Carolyn Colvin


Date Argued: Fri May 06 2016
Case Number: 13-36025
Docket Number: 7835716
Judges:Tashima, Tallman, Hurwitz
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Donald Stacy v. Carolyn Colvin, Docket Number 7835716** **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Please insert the date of the filing or verdict, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Donald Stacy - **Defendant:** Carolyn Colvin (Acting Commissioner of Social Security) **Background:** Donald Stacy filed a lawsuit against Carolyn Colvin, challenging the decision made by the Social Security Administration (SSA) regarding his eligibility for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) benefits. The case arises from Stacy's claim that he suffers from a disability that significantly limits his ability to perform basic work activities, thus making him eligible for benefits under the Social Security Act. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issue in this case is whether the administrative law judge (ALJ) who reviewed Stacy's claim erred in his findings regarding Stacy's disability status. The plaintiff contends that the ALJ did not adequately consider the medical evidence and failed to apply the correct legal standards in evaluating his claim. **Court's Findings:** The court analyzed the ALJ’s decision with regard to: 1. The evaluation of medical evidence submitted by Stacy's healthcare providers. 2. The credibility of Stacy’s testimony concerning his limitations and daily activities. 3. Whether the ALJ properly applied the five-step sequential process used to determine disability under the Social Security Act. The court may have found that the ALJ erred in one or more aspects of the decision-making process, potentially leading it to reverse or remand the case for further proceedings. **Conclusion:** This case highlights the complexities involved in the adjudication of disability claims under Social Security law. The outcome of this case may set a precedent regarding the importance of thorough evaluations of medical evidence and proper application of legal standards in future disability determinations. **Recommendations:** Based on the findings, the court may recommend that the SSA reassess Stacy's application with a renewed examination of the medical evidence, ensuring compliance with the established legal framework for determining disability. --- **Note:** This summary is fictional and does not correspond to a real case. For accurate details of the case, please consult legal databases or court records.

Donald Stacy v. Carolyn Colvin


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available