Legal Case Summary

Doug Greisen v. Jon Hanken


Date Argued: Thu Oct 11 2018
Case Number: 17-35472
Docket Number: 8018570
Judges:Fisher, Clifton, Callahan
Duration: 45 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Doug Greisen v. Jon Hanken** **Docket Number:** 8018570 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Date:** [Insert Date Here] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Doug Greisen - **Defendant:** Jon Hanken **Case Overview:** This case involves a civil dispute between Doug Greisen and Jon Hanken. The nature of the dispute, specifics of the claims, and the procedural posture of the case would be outlined in the case filings and court records. **Facts:** - Details of the factual background leading to the legal dispute, including any relevant events or transactions between the parties, would be elaborated here. - This may involve contractual obligations, tort claims, or other relevant interactions between Greisen and Hanken. **Legal Issues:** - The primary legal issues to be resolved in this case will depend on the claims asserted by Greisen against Hanken. - Possible issues could include breach of contract, negligence, or other statutory or common law claims. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Doug Greisen may argue [insert plaintiff's key arguments or claims]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Jon Hanken likely presents defenses, which may include [insert defense arguments]. **Rulings:** - If available, summarize any rulings or significant decisions made by the court concerning motions, evidence, or preliminary matters leading up to the resolution of the case. **Outcome:** - If the case has been resolved, briefly summarize the verdict or settlement, including any awards, damages, or injunctions granted by the court. - If the case is ongoing or in a particular procedural step, state that and provide details if possible. **Significance:** - Discuss the broader legal or social implications of the case, including how it might affect similar cases or its contribution to legal precedents. **Conclusion:** This case presents important issues surrounding [insert relevant legal issues]. The court’s resolution will clarify [insert implications or anticipated impacts on law]. *Note: For complete and specific details regarding arguments, rulings, and factual background, refer to case documents and court records.*

Doug Greisen v. Jon Hanken


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available