Case Summary
**Case Summary: Douglas Camp v. Mary Berghuis**
**Docket Number:** 2611763
**Court:** Michigan Court of Appeals
**Date:** (Assuming recent or relevant date since no specific date was provided)
**Overview:**
The case of Douglas Camp v. Mary Berghuis involves a legal dispute in which the petitioner, Douglas Camp, challenges the actions or decisions made by Mary Berghuis, the respondent. The underlying issues typically involve matters concerning civil rights, prison conditions, or habeas corpus proceedings.
**Background:**
Douglas Camp, the petitioner, may have been seeking relief from a prior ruling or decision affecting his rights or conditions while incarcerated. The specifics of the case would encompass the claims made by Camp, which could include violations of his constitutional rights, conditions of confinement, or any procedural missteps in the legal process he faced.
**Arguments:**
1. **Petitioner's Arguments:**
- Camp likely argued that the respondent, Berghuis, failed to uphold his legal rights, potentially citing specific laws or amendments that support his claims for relief or modification of his situation.
- He may have presented evidence or previous rulings that further substantiate his claims of wrongful treatment or violation of rights.
2. **Respondent's Arguments:**
- Berghuis would defend the actions taken, asserting that they were within her legal authority and complied with constitutional and statutory requirements.
- The defense may have provided counter-evidence, highlighting the legality of Camp's confinement conditions or the appropriateness of the decisions made regarding his case.
**Holding:**
The outcome of the case would depend on the Michigan Court of Appeals' review of the evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties. The court may have upheld, modified, or overturned previous decisions based on legal interpretations of the issues raised in this case.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Douglas Camp v. Mary Berghuis exemplifies the continual struggle for individuals within the criminal justice system to challenge the legality of their confinement and the conditions thereof. This summary reflects a general outline of what such a case might involve; specifics would depend on the detailed evidence, testimonies, and legal principles at play.
(Note: This summary is based on typical case structures and does not reflect specific details from the actual case without further information. Please provide more context, and I can refine the summary.)