Legal Case Summary

Douglas Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins


Date Argued: Fri Oct 23 2015
Case Number:
Docket Number: 3006805
Judges:Black, Wallace, Clifton
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name:

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Douglas Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company** **Docket Number:** 3006805 **Court:** (Please specify the court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court, State Court, etc.) **Date:** (Please specify the date if known) **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Douglas Powell - **Defendant:** Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company **Background:** Douglas Powell filed a lawsuit against Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company regarding the denial of benefits under a disability insurance policy. Powell contended that he was entitled to benefits due to a disabling condition that rendered him unable to work. **Facts:** 1. **Policy Details:** Powell held a disability insurance policy issued by Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company. 2. **Claim Submission:** After sustaining an injury/illness, Powell filed a claim for disability benefits, asserting that his condition prevented him from performing his job duties. 3. **Denial of Benefits:** Hartford Life reviewed the claim and subsequently denied it, citing reasons such as insufficient medical evidence or failure to meet policy criteria. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolve around: - Whether Hartford Life's denial of benefits was justified based on the terms of the insurance policy. - Whether Powell provided adequate evidence to support his claim for disability. - Possible violations of relevant insurance laws or regulations governing the handling of such claims. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Powell argued that the denial was unjustified and that he had provided sufficient medical documentation proving his disability. He sought compensatory benefits, along with potential damages for emotional distress or other claims related to the insurance company’s handling of his case. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Hartford Life maintained that the documentation submitted did not sufficiently demonstrate that Powell met the policy’s criteria for disability, and therefore, the denial was valid. **Outcome:** (Provide details about the outcome of the case if known, such as whether it was settled, went to trial, or resulted in a judgment.) **Significance:** This case underscores important issues regarding the obligations of insurance companies in reviewing claims and the rights of policyholders seeking benefits. It may also provide precedent for future cases involving similar disability claims and the standards of evidence required. **Conclusion:** The resolution of Douglas Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company will impact not only the plaintiff’s ability to recover benefits but also set a precedent for how disability insurance claims are evaluated and defended in court. (Note: The details provided in this summary are fictional and intended as a template. Specific case details, arguments, and outcomes should be derived from actual court records or legal documents pertaining to the case.)

Douglas Powell v. Hartford Life and Accident Ins


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available