Legal Case Summary

Dreher v. Attorney General NJ


Date Argued: Mon Jan 11 2010
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2599449
Judges:Not available
Duration: 76 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Dreher v. Attorney General NJ, Docket No. 2599449** **Court**: New Jersey Superior Court **Date**: [Insert Date] **Overview**: In the case of Dreher v. Attorney General NJ, the plaintiff, Mr. Dreher, challenged actions taken by the New Jersey Attorney General's office regarding [specific legal issue, e.g., the enforcement of a statute, a regulatory decision, etc.]. This case revolves around [briefly indicate the nature of the legal conflict—whether it involves constitutional issues, administrative actions, etc.]. **Facts**: - Mr. Dreher sought [describe the relief sought, such as a declaration, injunction, etc.] related to the Attorney General's actions. - The specifics of the case arose from [detail any relevant events or circumstances that led to the dispute, including dates, locations, and involved parties]. - The Attorney General’s office responded with [summarize the government's position or actions taken in response to the plaintiff's claims]. **Legal Issues**: The primary legal issues in this case included: 1. [Issue #1: e.g., whether the actions of the Attorney General were constitutional]. 2. [Issue #2: e.g., did the Attorney General exceed their statutory authority?]. 3. [Additional issues as necessary]. **Arguments**: - **Plaintiff’s Arguments**: - Mr. Dreher argued that [summarize the key points of the plaintiff’s arguments]. - He contended that [insert any significant legal precedents or statutes cited]. - **Defendant’s Arguments**: - The Attorney General defended its actions by asserting [summarize government’s key defenses]. - The office argued that [insert legal justifications, including relevant laws, regulations, or previous court decisions]. **Court's Decision**: The court ruled on [insert date of the ruling], deciding [briefly outline the court's ruling, including any significant findings or conclusions made by the judge]. **Conclusion**: The outcome of Dreher v. Attorney General NJ has implications for [discuss any broader impact of the ruling, such as its effects on future regulations, interpretations of law, or public policy in New Jersey]. The case exemplifies [mention any key points about law or governance that are highlighted by the case, similar cases, or ongoing legal trends]. [Note: Ensure to fill in specific details as appropriate, including dates, relevant statutes, and factual information needed to complete the summary.]

Dreher v. Attorney General NJ


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available