Legal Case Summary

Duane Minnick v. County of Currituck


Date Argued: Thu Mar 21 2013
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2601062
Judges:J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Robert B. King, James A. Wynn, Jr.
Duration: 62 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Duane Minnick v. County of Currituck** **Docket Number: 2601062** **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Superior Court of Currituck County] **Date:** [Specify date of court ruling, if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Duane Minnick - **Defendant:** County of Currituck **Background:** Duane Minnick filed a lawsuit against the County of Currituck alleging [briefly state the nature of the complaint, e.g., negligence, breach of duty, violation of rights, etc.]. The dispute arose from events that occurred on [provide relevant date or timeframe]. Minnick contended that [summarize the plaintiff's position and claims, including any relevant facts that support his position]. **Key Issues:** 1. **[First Legal Issue]:** [Description of the first issue, e.g., was the County negligent in their duty to ensure safety?] 2. **[Second Legal Issue]:** [Description of the second issue, e.g., did the County follow proper procedures?] 3. **[Additional Issues]:** [List any other relevant issues that the court needed to address.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Minnick argued that [summarize the main points of the plaintiff’s argument], asserting that the County was responsible for [explain the basis of liability or wrongdoing]. - **Defendant's Argument:** The County of Currituck contended that [summarize the defendant’s defenses and counterarguments], maintaining that [discuss any legal precedents or statutes cited]. **Ruling:** The court [describe the court's ruling, e.g., found in favor of the plaintiff or defendant, or dismissed the case]. The judge held that [summarize the reasoning behind the ruling, including any legal principles or precedents applied]. **Outcome:** The case resulted in a decision that [state the implications of the ruling for both parties, any awarded damages or orders for corrective action, etc.]. The ruling may [mention if the decision can be appealed or if there were any immediate actions ordered by the court]. **Significance:** This case illustrates [discuss any broader implications of the case, particularly if it sets a legal precedent or addresses a significant issue in public governance or civil rights]. It highlights the responsibility of local governments in ensuring [point out any key themes or lessons from the case]. **Next Steps:** The parties may pursue [mention any next steps available, such as potential appeals, settlements, or future legal action]. --- Note: This summary is a hypothetical construction based on typical legal case formats. For accurate details regarding the case, consult official court documents or legal resources.

Duane Minnick v. County of Currituck


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available