Legal Case Summary

Duanna Knighton v. Cedarville Rancheria of NPI


Date Argued: Fri Nov 16 2018
Case Number: 17-15515
Docket Number: 8204721
Judges:Tashima, M. Smith, Piersol
Duration: 21 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Duanna Knighton v. Cedarville Rancheria of NPI** **Docket Number**: 8204721 **Court**: [Insert Court Name] **Date**: [Insert Date of Filing/Decision] **Parties Involved**: - **Plaintiff**: Duanna Knighton - **Defendant**: Cedarville Rancheria of NPI **Background**: Duanna Knighton filed a lawsuit against Cedarville Rancheria of NPI, a Native American tribe. The case revolves around [insert the specific legal issues, such as employment disputes, contract disagreements, civil rights violations, etc.]. Knighton alleges that [insert key allegations made by the plaintiff against the defendant]. **Facts**: The facts of the case can be summarized as follows: - [Briefly outline the key facts of the case, including the context and the events leading up to the lawsuit.] - [Highlight any relevant interactions between Knighton and the Cedarville Rancheria that are pertinent to the claims made.] - [Include any important dates, agreements, or actions taken that are central to the dispute.] **Legal Issues**: The primary legal issues presented in this case include: - [List the main legal questions that the court needs to address, such as jurisdictional issues, contract enforcement, employment law considerations, etc.] - [Mention any specific laws, statutes, or precedents that are relevant to the case.] **Arguments**: - **Plaintiff’s Argument**: Knighton claims that [summarize the plaintiff's legal arguments and the relief sought, e.g., damages, injunction, etc.]. - **Defendant’s Argument**: Cedarville Rancheria argues that [summarize the defense's position and any counterclaims if applicable]. **Outcome**: As of the latest information available, the case is currently [insert the status of the case, whether it is pending, has been settled, or has been decided]. The court's ruling [insert any specific outcomes or judgments made in the case, if applicable]. **Significance**: This case is significant because [discuss the implications of the case for the parties involved, the legal community, or broader societal issues]. **Next Steps**: - [Outline any further actions that may be taken, such as appeals or additional motions.] **Note**: For the most accurate and updated information regarding the case status, refer to the official court records or legal databases.

Duanna Knighton v. Cedarville Rancheria of NPI


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available