Legal Case Summary

Durham v. Lockheed Martin


Date Argued: Thu Oct 20 2005
Case Number: 04-15243
Docket Number: 7857455
Judges:Beezer, Kozinski, Hatter
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Durham v. Lockheed Martin, Docket Number 7857455** **Court:** [Insert relevant court] **Date:** [Insert date of judgment or filing] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** [Name of plaintiff, e.g., Durham] - **Defendant:** Lockheed Martin Corporation **Background:** In the case of Durham v. Lockheed Martin, the plaintiff, Durham, filed a lawsuit against the aerospace and defense company, Lockheed Martin. The specifics of the case stem from allegations that pertain to [insert main legal issue, e.g., employment discrimination, wrongful termination, contract breach, etc.]. Durham claims that as an employee of Lockheed Martin, he/she experienced [insert relevant events, e.g., discriminatory practices, unsafe working conditions, etc.], which led to [insert impact, e.g., emotional distress, financial loss, job loss]. The plaintiff sought legal remedy through the court system, alleging violations of [insert applicable laws or regulations, e.g., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, contract law, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The key legal questions presented in this case include: 1. Whether Lockheed Martin violated [specific law or regulation] as claimed by Durham. 2. Whether the evidence presented supports Durham’s allegations. 3. What damages, if any, are appropriate if the plaintiff’s claims are upheld. **Proceedings:** In the initial stages of the case, both parties engaged in discovery, where evidence was gathered, including testimonies, documents, and expert opinions. The court heard motions from both sides regarding [insert significant pre-trial motions or rulings, if applicable]. **Ruling:** The court ultimately rendered a decision on [insert date of decision]. The ruling addressed the claims presented by Durham against Lockheed Martin, determining whether they were substantiated by the evidence provided. The court considered both the factual background and the application of relevant law, ultimately concluding [summarize the court's findings, such as "in favor of Durham," or "in favor of Lockheed Martin," along with any awarded damages or remedies]. **Impact:** This case is significant as it highlights [insert implications of the ruling, such as workplace rights, corporate responsibility, policy changes, etc.]. The decision could set a precedent for similar cases in the future involving [insert relevant issues]. **Conclusion:** Durham v. Lockheed Martin underscores the complexities of employment-related legal disputes in the corporate sector and exemplifies the judicial process in addressing claims of [insert relevant legal issue]. The outcome will likely influence both parties and serve as a reference for future litigation of this nature. (Note: Since this is a hypothetical case summary and specific details were not provided, please insert the actual facts, legal issues, outcomes, and any other necessary information to create a complete case summary.)

Durham v. Lockheed Martin


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available