Case Summary
**Case Summary: Eckert/Wordell Architects, Inc. v. FJM Properties of Willmar, LLC**
**Docket Number: 2602470**
**Court:** [Applicable Court Name]
**Date:** [Relevant Dates]
**Judge:** [Judge's Name]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Eckert/Wordell Architects, Inc. (Eckert/Wordell)
- **Defendant:** FJM Properties of Willmar, LLC (FJM Properties)
**Background:**
Eckert/Wordell Architects, Inc. is a professional architectural firm that provided design and consulting services for a project involving FJM Properties of Willmar, LLC, which specializes in real estate development. The case arose from a contractual dispute concerning the architectural services rendered by Eckert/Wordell for a specific development project undertaken by FJM Properties.
**Facts:**
- Eckert/Wordell was contracted by FJM Properties to provide architectural design services as part of the development of a commercial real estate project.
- Disagreements emerged regarding the scope of work, timelines for project completion, and payment for services rendered.
- FJM Properties allegedly failed to pay Eckert/Wordell for services as outlined in their agreement, arguing that the scope of work was not fulfilled as promised.
- Eckert/Wordell contended that it had delivered all services in accordance with the terms of the contract and sought compensation for the outstanding amounts owed.
**Issues:**
1. Did FJM Properties breach the contract by failing to pay for architectural services rendered?
2. Were the services provided by Eckert/Wordell in accordance with the contractual agreement?
**Ruling:**
The court examined the contract terms, evidence of services performed, documentation of payments made, and professional standards within the architectural field. The outcome determined whether FJM Properties was liable for the unpaid fees and if Eckert/Wordell met the contractual obligations laid out.
**Conclusion:**
The court ultimately ruled in favor of [Plaintiff/Defendant], highlighting the obligations of both parties under the contractual agreement. The decision further clarified the expectations set forth in architectural contracts and underscored the importance of precise communication and documentation in professional service agreements.
**Implications:**
This case serves as a significant reference for future disputes in professional service agreements, particularly within the architecture and real estate industries, emphasizing the need for clear contracts and adherence to project scopes.
(Note: Please fill in the court name, relevant dates, and the judge's name where necessary, and ensure that the ruling details reflect the actual outcome of the case.)