Legal Case Summary

Edmond Ovasapyan v. City of Glendale


Date Argued: Mon Dec 06 2010
Case Number: 09-55798
Docket Number: 7846646
Judges:Brewster, Trott, Wardlaw
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Edmond Ovasapyan v. City of Glendale** **Docket Number:** 7846646 **Court:** [Court Name] **Date:** [Date of Filing/Decision] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Edmond Ovasapyan - **Defendant:** City of Glendale **Background:** The case involves a dispute between Edmond Ovasapyan and the City of Glendale, arising from [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., a personal injury claim, employment matter, civil rights issue, etc.]. The plaintiff asserts that [provide a brief overview of the claims made by Ovasapyan against the City of Glendale]. **Facts:** - [Detail key facts relevant to the case, such as dates, locations, actions taken by each party, and any relevant background information.] - [Include specifics about the incident, if applicable, that led to the legal action.] - [Mention any administrative or procedural steps taken prior to the litigation, such as complaints filed or responses from the City of Glendale.] **Legal Issues:** - The primary legal issues in this case include [list and briefly explain the main legal questions the court is addressing, such as negligence, violation of civil rights, statutory interpretation, etc.]. - [Note any motions filed by either party, such as motions to dismiss or for summary judgment.] **Court’s Analysis:** - [Summarize the court’s reasoning regarding the legal issues presented. Include key points about the laws or statutes applied, as well as interpretations by the judge.] - [Discuss any precedents cited and how they influenced the court’s decision.] **Outcome:** - [Explain the court’s ruling. Include whether the court ruled in favor of Ovasapyan, the City of Glendale, or if the case was dismissed or settled.] - [Mention any awards for damages, injunctions, or declaratory relief provided by the court.] **Conclusion:** This case illustrates [reflect on the significance of the decision, its impact on local governance, or potential implications for similar cases in the future]. The outcome of Edmond Ovasapyan v. City of Glendale will serve as [a precedent or highlight key issues relevant to municipal liability, civil rights, etc.]. **Notes:** - Further details may include [any pending appeals, reactions from the community or officials, and future implications for policy or practice in Glendale or similar jurisdictions]. --- Please note that specific details such as the nature of claims, key dates, and court names were not provided, so you would need to fill in that information based on the actual case documents or court records.

Edmond Ovasapyan v. City of Glendale


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available