Case Summary
**Case Summary: Edward Zimbelman v. S. Nevada Regional Housing Authority**
**Docket Number:** 2603775
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date of Decision]
**Background:**
Edward Zimbelman, the plaintiff, brought a case against the Southern Nevada Regional Housing Authority (SNRHA), the defendant, concerning issues arising from a housing agreement. The dispute likely involved allegations of improper handling of rental agreements, discrimination, or failure to provide adequate housing as stipulated under federal or state housing laws.
**Facts:**
- Edward Zimbelman was a tenant under the jurisdiction of the SNRHA.
- The defendant is responsible for administering housing programs and complying with applicable housing regulations.
- The plaintiff claimed various grievances, which may include unauthorized eviction, denial of necessary housing services, or issues related to housing quality.
**Legal Issues:**
The legal issues in this case revolved around (1) the interpretation of housing regulations and rights under the tenancy agreement, (2) potential violations of federal housing law (such as the Fair Housing Act), and (3) the obligations of the SNRHA in administering housing services.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Zimbelman likely argued that the SNRHA failed to uphold its responsibilities, leading to hardship or discrimination. Evidence may have been presented in the form of communications, records of complaints, and testimonies from other tenants or housing officials.
- **Defendant's Argument:** The SNRHA may have defended its actions by citing adherence to policies, arguing that any alleged issues fell within legal parameters, and emphasizing the challenges faced in managing public housing resources.
**Court's Decision:**
The court reviewed the evidence and legal frameworks relevant to the case. The ruling may have addressed the validity of the plaintiff's claims, the accountability of the defendant, and the enforcement of housing rights. The outcome could have included a ruling in favor of Zimbelman, potentially resulting in remedies such as financial compensation, reinstatement of tenancy, or mandated changes to SNRHA policies.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Edward Zimbelman v. S. Nevada Regional Housing Authority highlights the complex nature of tenant rights and housing authority responsibilities. The decision reflected on the legal standards governing housing agencies and the protections afforded to tenants under local, state, and federal laws.
**Note:** Specific details regarding the court’s ruling, the nature of the grievances, and the final outcomes should be inserted based on the actual case judgment and documents available in the court record.