Case Summary
**Case Summary: Eleven Engineering, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation (Docket No. 6088046)**
**Court**: [Specific Court Name, if available]
**Date Filed**: [Date of filing, if available]
**Judges**: [Names of presiding judges, if available]
**Parties Involved**:
- **Plaintiff**: Eleven Engineering, Inc.
- **Defendant**: Microsoft Corporation
**Background**:
Eleven Engineering, Inc. is a technology company specializing in the development of innovative audio and video solutions. The case arises from allegations made by Eleven Engineering against Microsoft Corporation regarding patent infringement. Eleven Engineering claims that Microsoft has utilized its patented technology without authorization in its software products, leading to significant financial loss for the plaintiff.
**Legal Issues**:
The primary legal issues in this case involve:
1. **Patent Infringement**: Whether Microsoft’s products infringe upon the patents held by Eleven Engineering.
2. **Damages**: What damages Eleven Engineering is entitled to if patent infringement is established.
3. **Defenses**: The legal defenses presented by Microsoft against the patent infringement claims.
**Arguments**:
- **Plaintiff's Argument**: Eleven Engineering argues that Microsoft had knowledge of their patented technology and willfully infringed on their patents by incorporating them into their software solutions. They seek compensatory damages, including lost profits, and a permanent injunction to prevent further infringement.
- **Defendant's Argument**: Microsoft contends that their software does not infringe on Eleven Engineering’s patents. They may argue the patents are invalid due to prior art or that their technology operates in a manner that is significantly different from the patented technology.
**Procedural History**:
The case proceedings may include pre-trial motions, discovery disputes, and potential settlement negotiations. The court may have held hearings to consider motions for summary judgment or to resolve discovery disputes.
**Outcome**:
As of the latest information available, the outcome of the case may still be pending. This could encompass a ruling from the court, potential settlements between the parties, or ongoing appeals.
**Significance**:
This case is significant in that it addresses key issues surrounding patent law, technology innovation, and the challenges smaller companies face when litigating against larger corporations. The ruling may set a precedent regarding the enforcement of patent rights in the technology sector.
**Next Steps**:
The court's next steps may involve scheduling trial dates, ruling on pending motions, or facilitating further settlement discussions between the parties.
**Note**: For the most current details regarding this case, including specific court rulings or developments post-filing, it is advisable to consult official court records or legal databases.