Legal Case Summary

Farris v. Barnhart


Date Argued: Wed Jul 13 2005
Case Number: 04-35270
Docket Number: 7857837
Judges:Tashima, Paez, Callahan
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Farris v. Barnhart, Docket Number 7857837** **Court:** [Specify the Court if known, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Specify the Date if known] **Plaintiff:** Farris **Defendant:** Barnhart (likely a representative of the Social Security Administration) **Background:** In Farris v. Barnhart, the plaintiff, Farris, filed a case against the defendant, Barnhart, regarding matters related to Social Security benefits. The central issue of the case typically revolves around Farris's claim for disability benefits that were denied or contested by the Social Security Administration (SSA), represented by Barnhart. **Facts:** - Farris applied for Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) or Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits, claiming an inability to work due to a disability. - The SSA evaluated Farris's medical history, work history, and the impact of the alleged disability on his ability to perform work-related activities. - The application was denied at various levels of administrative review, potentially including initial denial and reconsideration. **Legal Issues:** - The primary legal issue presented before the court might involve whether the SSA's denial of benefits was justified based on the evidence provided by the plaintiff and the regulations governing disability claims. - The court must assess whether the SSA's decision was supported by substantial evidence and whether the proper legal standards were applied in evaluating Farris's claim. **Outcome:** - [Specify the outcome if known, e.g., the court's decision to uphold or reverse the SSA's decision.] - If the court ruled in favor of Farris, it may have ordered the SSA to award benefits retroactively or to reconsider the claim with specific guidance. - If the court upheld the SSA's decision, it might have provided a rationale explaining why the evidence did not substantiate Farris's disability claims according to the legal standards. **Conclusion:** Farris v. Barnhart serves as an example of challenges faced by individuals seeking disability benefits from the Social Security Administration. The ruling highlights the importance of thorough documentation and evidence in disability claims and illustrates the judicial process in reviewing administrative decisions. **Note:** For specific details regarding the court's ruling and implications, further research or access to court records may be necessary, as the summary provided is based on typical case structures and does not include specific judicial findings or decisions without additional records.

Farris v. Barnhart


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available