Legal Case Summary

Federal Trade v. Stefanchik


Date Argued: Thu Oct 23 2008
Case Number: 07-35359
Docket Number: 7851370
Judges:Tallman, Smith, Reavley
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Federal Trade Commission v. Stefanchik, Docket No. 7851370** **Court:** United States District Court **Filing Date:** August 6, 2004 **Background:** The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) initiated a lawsuit against Michael Stefanchik alleging that he engaged in deceptive practices through his operation of an online business that marketed credit card services, which included falsely advertising guaranteed approvals for consumers regardless of their credit history. The FTC contended that these representations were misleading and violated the Federal Trade Commission Act, which prohibits unfair or deceptive acts in commerce. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues in this case included: 1. Whether Stefanchik's advertising practices constituted false or misleading representations in violation of the FTC Act. 2. Whether Stefanchik's actions caused substantial injury to consumers, necessitating redress. 3. Appropriate remedies, including civil penalties and consumer redress. **Court Proceedings:** The FTC sought both a permanent injunction against Stefanchik to prevent future violations and monetary relief for affected consumers. During the proceedings, evidence was presented by the FTC regarding consumer complaints and the misleading nature of Stefanchik’s advertisements. **Outcome:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of the FTC, finding that Stefanchik had indeed engaged in deceptive advertising practices. The court issued a permanent injunction against Stefanchik, preventing him from making similar misrepresentations in the future. Furthermore, the court ordered Stefanchik to provide restitution to affected consumers. **Significance:** This case highlights the FTC’s commitment to combating deceptive practices in the marketing of consumer financial products and underscores the importance of transparency and honesty in advertising. It serves as a precedent for similar cases involving online marketing practices and consumer protection. **Conclusion:** Federal Trade Commission v. Stefanchik illustrates the legal frameworks in place to protect consumers from deceptive marketing practices and reflects the proactive measures the FTC takes to enforce consumer protection laws in the digital landscape.

Federal Trade v. Stefanchik


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available