Legal Case Summary

Fire-Trol v. United States


Date Argued: Thu Oct 19 2006
Case Number: 04-17101
Docket Number: 7855782
Judges:Reinhardt, Rymer, Thomas
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Fire-Trol v. United States** **Docket Number:** 7855782 **Court:** [Appropriate Court Name, if available] **Date:** [Date of ruling or filing, if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Fire-Trol - **Defendant:** United States **Background:** Fire-Trol, a company specializing in fire suppression technology, brought a lawsuit against the United States government. The fundamental issue in this case revolves around the contractual obligations and relationship between Fire-Trol and a government agency that was responsible for fire management and suppression. **Facts:** - Fire-Trol alleged that the United States breached an existing contract or failed to fulfill its obligations regarding the procurement of fire suppression services and products. - The company claimed that this breach resulted in significant financial losses and affected its operations and reputation in the industry. - The United States, in its defense, contended that it had met its contractual obligations and that Fire-Trol failed to comply with certain terms of the agreement. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues included: 1. Whether the United States breached its contract with Fire-Trol. 2. The interpretation of the contract terms regarding performance expectations. 3. Assessment of damages incurred by Fire-Trol due to the alleged breach. **Ruling:** [Insert the court's ruling or decision; both parties' positions, whether it favored Fire-Trol or the United States, and any important judicial reasoning that highlights the court's interpretation of contract law.] **Impact:** The outcome of this case had implications for government contracting practices and the responsibilities outlined in agreements with private companies. Additionally, it highlighted the challenges that contractors may face in enforcing their rights against governmental entities. **Conclusion:** Fire-Trol v. United States served as a significant case in the realm of government contracts, emphasizing the necessity for clear contractual terms and the complexities involved in litigating such disputes against federal entities. **Note:** Details such as the court's ruling, the specific legal arguments made, and the timeline of events should be updated based on the complete record of the case. This summary is an outline and requires further details from specific court documentation for accuracy.

Fire-Trol v. United States


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available