Legal Case Summary

Forsthoffervs Max Cohen&Sons


Date Argued: Wed Jun 10 2009
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2599074
Judges:Not available
Duration: 41 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Forsthoffer v. Max Cohen & Sons** **Docket Number:** 2599074 **Court:** [Specify the court if applicable] **Filing Date:** [Specify the filing date if known] **Decision Date:** [Specify the decision date if known] **Facts of the Case:** This case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Forsthoffer, and the defendant, Max Cohen & Sons. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant breached a contract related to [specify type of contract, e.g., sale of goods, lease agreement, etc.]. The plaintiff contends that the defendant failed to [specify the breach, e.g., deliver goods as promised, pay the agreed amount, etc.], resulting in damages to the plaintiff. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case center around [specify the legal issues, such as breach of contract, damages, specific performance, etc.]. The plaintiff seeks [specify the relief sought, e.g., monetary damages, specific performance, etc.], arguing that the breach has caused significant financial harm. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Forsthoffer argues that Max Cohen & Sons had a clear contractual obligation which was not fulfilled. Evidence presented includes [briefly summarize key evidence or testimonies, if known]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Max Cohen & Sons contends that [briefly summarize the defendant’s defense, such as denial of breach, justification for actions, etc.]. They may claim that any failure to perform was due to [specify any reasons, such as force majeure, inability to fulfill obligations, etc.]. **Court's Analysis:** The court examined the evidence presented by both parties, focusing on [highlight any key points in the analysis, such as the interpretation of contract terms, the credibility of witnesses, etc.]. The court applied relevant legal principles regarding contract law to determine whether a breach occurred and whether the plaintiff had suffered damages as a result. **Conclusion:** [Specify the court's ruling, e.g., the court found in favor of Forsthoffer, awarding damages, or ruled in favor of Max Cohen & Sons, dismissing the case, etc. Include any orders or directions from the court]. The case highlights important aspects of contract enforcement and the consequences of non-compliance in business dealings. **Significance:** This case serves as a precedent for similar contract disputes, emphasizing the necessity for clear contractual terms and the importance of fulfilling contractual obligations. --- *Note: Specific details regarding parties' arguments, evidence, court analysis, and outcomes would typically require further context from the court records or published opinions.*

Forsthoffervs Max Cohen&Sons


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available